Relation to the world· Nature and the livingcoredifficulty
Vision of humanity
Are human beings fundamentally good or inclined toward evil?
To believe humans good is to be able to trust them, loosen the rules, bet on freedom; to believe them prone to evil is to deem laws, controls, and safeguards necessary to hold common life together. To take a position is to say how far to trust others, and how many constraints a society needs.
Anthropological optimism
8Human beings are naturally good, or at least inclined to pity and benevolence: it is society, with its inequalities and rivalries, that corrupts them. Wickedness is a product of history, not of nature.
Explore this position →Rousseauexplicit
« Man is naturally good »: his vices lie not in his nature but in the history that has drawn him from it. In the state of nature, self-love and reign, not wickedness; it is property, comparison and that breed inequality and domination. Rousseau thus overturns the dogma of original sin and shifts the fault from nature to society: it is not men who must first be corrected, but institutions.
Rousseau, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality · Rousseau, Emile, book I
The Enlightenmentexplicit
Against the dogma of original sin, which makes man a corrupt creature to be redeemed, the Enlightenment wagers on his : his vices owe less to his nature than to bad institutions and to ignorance. If the mind is a , then education can do almost everything, holds : change the laws, the enlightenment and the mores, and you change men. radicalizes the wager, man being naturally good and corrupted by society, while , more sombre, keeps it within measure. Hence a tempered optimism, founded not on what man is but on what he can become.
Helvétius, On the Mind · Rousseau, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality · Locke, Some Thoughts Concerning Education
Show more (6)
Laoziinferable
Evil does not come from a corrupt human nature but from what corrupts it: affected knowledge, craving, institutions that pit a person against their . "Abolish wisdom, discard knowledge, and the people will benefit a hundredfold": it suffices to cut away artifice for an original goodness to reappear, like uncarved wood before it is sculpted. This trust in the natural, close to , sets him apart from pessimism.
Dao De Jing, ch. 19 and 28 · Dao De Jing, ch. 3 and 65
Marxinferable
The vices imputed to human nature, selfishness, greed, aggression, are for Marx products of alienating social conditions, not a fatality of the species: change the relations of production and you change men. This hope of an emancipated human being, able to develop his faculties freely in a classless society, expresses a conditional , suspended on the transformation of conditions.
1844 Manuscripts (species-being and the overcoming of alienation) · Theses on Feuerbach, III (circumstances are changed by men)
Romanticisminferable
Heir to , Romanticism holds the human being to be naturally good and the spontaneity of the heart surer than the artifices of civilization: the child, the common people and the poet are nearer the truth than polished man. Yet this confidence is doubled by a fascination with the abysses of the soul, the demonic and evil, which tempers its optimism.
Rousseau, Emile, or On Education · Schiller, On Naive and Sentimental Poetry
Zhuangziinferable
Evil lies not in a corrupt human nature but in what denatures it: affected knowledge, ambition, hierarchies and moral codes that turn each one away from his native cast. Left to his , the human is neither good nor wicked in the moral sense, but spontaneously attuned to the course of things; it is civilization that tears him apart. This trust in the pre-cultural natural sets Zhuangzi apart from anthropological pessimism, without making him the theorist of an original goodness as sharply drawn as in Rousseau.
Zhuangzi, ch. 9 (Horses' Hooves)
Confuciusinferable
Confucius holds man to be perfectible: any human being can, through study and effort, rise toward ren 仁 (humaneness), and he teaches without distinction of class. This optimism stays measured: the wise are rare, most betray the Way, and the master laments never having met one who loves virtue as much as pleasures. Yet trust in educability prevails.
Analects, XV, 38 (in teaching there are no distinctions of class) · Analects, IX, 17 (I have not seen one who loves virtue as he loves pleasure)
Socratesinferable
Moral intellectualism entails a fairly optimistic view of humankind: if we do evil only through ignorance, no one is bad by nature, and every person can be improved by knowledge. Vice is not an ineradicable wickedness but a failure of knowledge, which makes the human being educable and turns examination into a therapy of the soul.
Plato, Protagoras, 345d-e; Meno, 87b-89a (virtue, an acquirable knowledge)
Arguments and objections (3)
Moral plasticity
named middle2Human beings are neither good nor evil by nature: they are malleable. Neither angel nor beast, a person becomes what upbringing, habit and institutions make of them. Our defining trait is this plasticity, this capacity to be shaped, for better and for worse.
Explore this position →Show implicit positions (2)
Beauvoirinferable
For Beauvoir, the human being is neither good nor bad by nature, since it has no nature: it is what it makes of itself, capable of the noblest engagement as of the basest complicity with oppression. Moral worth depends on the use one makes of one's freedom, which forbids any blanket verdict, optimistic or pessimistic, on human nature.
The Ethics of Ambiguity (1947), freedom between engagement and evasion
Marcus Aureliusinferable
Marcus oscillates: the forecasts meddling, ungrateful and violent men, an unillusioned look at conduct; yet he holds their fault to be a correctable ignorance, not a malice of nature. This tension places him at the median point, where human nature is neither good nor evil but educable.
Meditations, II, 1 · Meditations, IX, 42 · Meditations, XI, 18
Arguments and objections (2)
Anthropological pessimism
9Human beings are shot through with selfishness, self-regard, and aggressive drives that nothing fully erases. Institutions, laws, and morality are necessary dams against an ever-possible violence.
Explore this position →Schopenhauerexplicit
Boundless egoism is the natural spring of man, up to disinterested malice, that cruelty which delights in another's suffering for its own sake; civilization muzzles this ground without transforming it. The state is not an educator but a muzzle.
Parerga and Paralipomena, vol. II, 'On Ethics'
Machiavelliexplicit
Whoever founds a republic must presuppose all men wicked, ready to follow their malice as soon as they have free occasion: this is a legislator's postulate, not a metaphysics of the fall. Men are ungrateful, fickle, dissemblers, evaders of danger, greedy for gain. But this evil is not fixed: good laws and the goad of necessity can make them good, which keeps it short of an absolute pessimism.
The Prince, ch. XVII · Discourses on Livy, I.3
Show more (7)
Calliclesinferable
Everyone, if they dared, would pursue their own advantage and want to possess more than others: displayed moderation is only an admission of weakness or a ruse. This bedrock of egoism and rivalry, which law contains without abolishing, places him on the side of an anthropological pessimism.
Plato, Gorgias, 483b-c; 491e-492a
Michel de Montaigneinferable
Montaigne deflates man's pretension to think himself the masterpiece of creation, "the most calamitous and frail of all creatures", vain, inconstant, more often led by and fancy than by the reason he claims. But this indictment of pride is no black pessimism: man remains capable of goodness, measure and joy, provided he accepts his condition and stops trying to be an angel. It is less a verdict on his wickedness than an acknowledgment of his plasticity and weakness.
Essays, II, 12, "Apology for Raymond Sebond"
Nietzscheinferable
Man is a rope stretched between beast and , something that shall be overcome: Nietzsche casts a severe gaze on the gregarious, mediocre humanity of his age, marked by . But this critical diagnosis comes with confidence in the possibility of an elevation, which tempers the pessimism.
Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Prologue, §3 and §4 · On the Genealogy of Morality, I, §11
Kantinferable
Kant maintains a : there is in human nature a propensity to subordinate the moral law to self-love, and "unsocial sociability" mixes in each a tendency to oppose others. This diagnosis, tempered by the predisposition to good and by perfectibility, leans toward a moderate anthropological pessimism.
Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason, Part One · Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose, Fourth Proposition
Platoinferable
The ordinary person is a prisoner in the cave, chained to shadow and opinion, and most souls are ruled by the appetites: the ascent toward the true is rare, hard and reserved for a few. Without being a dark pessimism, this view stresses the soul's spontaneous blindness, which only a long education can set right.
Republic, VII, 514a-517a · Phaedrus, 248a-249d
Odysseusinferable
Odysseus trusts no one on their word: he tests loyalty before revealing himself, sounds out his servants, tries even and his aged father. This methodical wariness betrays a cautious, unillusioned view of men, quick to treachery once the chance offers; but it does not amount to a settled pessimism, since the poem also grants him, in a few, an unfailing fidelity.
Odyssey, XIII-XXIV (the disguise and the testing of loyalties) · Odyssey, XXIII (the test of the bed, which Penelope turns back against him)
Camusinferable
Camus believes neither in man's natural goodness nor in his radical corruption: his thought of measure sets a human limit against the excess that, in the name of an absolute, ends by justifying murder. This sense of the human leaning toward excess keeps him from anthropological optimism, without tipping into pessimism.
The Rebel (1951), "Thought at the Meridian"
Arguments and objections (3)
See the problem map in the Atlas →
- Descriptive Scientific experimentOrdinary people, an order to carry out
That ordinary people inflict the worst on a mere order: is it a latent cruelty waking up, or proof that circumstances, not nature, decide our acts?
the ordinary person under authority
Sub-problems to deepen this axis's discussion
- DescriptiveWhere does evil in humans come from?
If humans do evil, is that bent in them from the start, a drive or a fallen nature, or does it arise from without, from social comparison and inequality? Depending on the answer, wickedness is our depth or our product.
the source of our bad acts - DescriptiveHow far can human beings be changed?
The wager of education assumes we can remake people, soften them, better them. But are there immovable flaws, a "crooked timber" that no education ever straightens?
the human capacity to change - DescriptiveHalf angel, half beast
Is the human a divided being, capable at once of the highest and the lowest, great through the very thing that makes it wretched, or is this dramatic image merely a way of ennobling a mere animal by calling it fallen?
the divided human being
Related problems to broaden toward other axes
- DescriptiveIs there a human nature?
Asking whether humans are good or evil assumes they have a nature. But perhaps there is no given essence: humans would then make themselves, with no received model.
a human nature - DescriptiveDoes genuine altruism exist?
Do our most generous acts always hide an interest, a need to be loved, a vanity? If no truly disinterested act exists, talk of goodness loses its meaning.
our best actions - PrescriptivePolitical & legalInstitutions for angels, or for devils?
Should laws be designed counting on citizens' virtue, or built so that "even a nation of devils" would be forced to act well? One's vision of humanity governs the kind of institutions one deems necessary.
institutions - DescriptiveWhy can we not bear rest?
"All of humanity's unhappiness comes from one thing, not knowing how to stay quietly in a room": if we flee calm, is it the misery of our condition surfacing the moment the noise stops, as Pascal diagnoses, or is the mind simply made for movement rather than for facing itself?
the person at restAttention and diversion - DescriptiveWhat a human being can bear
Does a demand beyond our strength breed discouragement and hypocrisy, or must the ideal exceed what we are precisely in order to pull us upward? What morality may ask depends on what human beings can give.
human natureMoral demandingness
Man is at bottom a wild and terrible animal.Schopenhauer · Parerga and Paralipomena, vol. II, § 114 ('On Ethics')
Man is something that shall be overcome.Nietzsche · Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Prologue, §3
Everything is good as it leaves the hands of the Author of things; everything degenerates in the hands of man.Rousseau · Emile, book I