← See the axis · Vision of humanity

Neither angel nor beast

Man is neither good nor evil by nature: he is the malleable animal, who becomes what upbringing and habit make of him.

Supports Moral plasticity

Aristotle · Nicomachean Ethics, II, 1

1. Both camps rely on the same facts, reversed: one shows saints, the other torturers; one mutual aid, the other war. Yet these opposing facts are equally real.
2. For no fixed nature explains them: what is proper to man is to be unfixed, to learn, to contract habits, to be shaped. Virtue comes to him neither by nature nor against nature: he is by nature able to receive it, and habit brings it to completion.
3. So the same being becomes gentle or ferocious depending on what, in him, is cultivated or awakened: the question 'good or evil?' is ill-posed; the real question is 'by what is he formed?'.

Therefore So man is neither angel nor beast, but capable of both: his nature is this very plasticity, which makes education decisive and forbids betting either on a given goodness or on a fated wickedness.

How far does this reasoning convince you?