The questions

Relation to the world· Nature and the livingdifficulty

Nature and culture

Are human behaviors explained primarily by nature or by culture?

If our conduct stems from our nature, it changes only with difficulty and some differences seem given in advance; if it comes from culture, almost everything could be otherwise, at the risk of denying very real constraints. To take a position is to say what, in the human being, can be transformed, and what education and politics can hope to achieve.

NaturalismCulturalism
The poles, and who holds them

Naturalism

12

Human beings are first of all natural beings: their behaviors, desires, and even institutions are rooted in a biological history and in drives shared by the species. Culture merely modulates a natural foundation that precedes it.

Explore this position →
Associated figures: Darwin · Freud
Who stands here
Diogenes of Sinopeexplicit

Diogenes' whole gesture rests on a cut between (nature), which sets man simple needs and one common lot, and the (convention) of cities, which heaps on wealth, rank and modesties with no grounding in things. Man makes himself wretched precisely where he takes convention for nature, toiling for factitious goods and blushing at acts no animal deems shameful. To live according to nature is thus to undo this varnish: not an idealised return to a primal goodness, but a stripping away that brings conduct back to real need alone. Nature here is not a teleological norm but a negative criterion, what remains once artifice is removed.

Diogenes Laertius, Lives, VI, 70-71

Cynicismexplicit

Cynicism rests entirely on one cut: on one side physis (nature), which sets man simple needs and one common lot; on the other the nomos (convention) of cities, which heaps on wealth, rank, modesties and honours with no grounding in things. And man makes himself wretched precisely where he takes convention for nature, toiling for factitious goods and blushing at acts no animal deems shameful. To live according to nature is thus to undo this varnish: not an idealised return to a primal goodness, but a stripping away, bringing conduct back to what real need requires and counting the rest as smoke. Nature here is not a teleological norm but a negative criterion, what remains once artifice is removed.

Diogenes Laertius, Lives, VI, 70-71

Calliclesexplicit

His whole case erects into a norm: what beasts do among themselves, cities among themselves, the strong over the weak, that is justice "according to nature", which human convention only masks. He cites the conquests, the expedition of Xerxes, and Pindar's line making law the "king" that justifies the violence of the stronger.

Plato, Gorgias, 483d-484b (nature, animals, cities, Pindar)

Machiavelliexplicit

If history instructs present action, it is because human nature does not vary: in every city and people one finds the same desires and the same humors, and it was ever so. The two humors, that of the people and that of the great, run through all societies. Against the idea of a human being wholly shaped by culture, Machiavelli wagers on anthropological constants that make the past worth imitating.

Discourses on Livy, I.39 · Discourses on Livy, I.4 and Book I Preface

Lucretiusexplicit

Book V offers a natural history of humankind with no golden age and no fall: the first men, more robust, lived scattered like beasts, without fire, language or laws, harder and rougher than we are. It was need, use and the imitation of nature that, little by little, gave rise to fire, huts, articulate speech, the arts and cities. Man therefore has no fixed nature stamped in advance: he carries a common natural ground, but his customs and skills are the slow work of experience. The weight remains on the natural continuity of the human animal, hence a naturalist leaning tempered by this cultural genesis.

On the Nature of Things, V, 925-1027 (the first men, savage and scattered) · On the Nature of Things, V, 1028-1457 (the birth of language, fire, the arts and cities)

Show more (7)
Schopenhauerexplicit

Character is innate, constant, and beyond the reach of education: velle non discitur, willing cannot be taught. One can instruct the intellect and refine the means, never change the ground of what someone wills; nature commands, and circumstance only furnishes its occasions.

On the Freedom of the Will, ch. III

Humeinferable

Hume aims to ground a science of human nature on the experimental method: the same springs (passions, habit, sympathy) govern human beings in all times and places, and history is a store of observations on constant features. This uniformity of human nature, indispensable to moral science, reflects a marked naturalism, even as he acknowledges the weight of mores and custom.

A Treatise of Human Nature, introduction (the project of a science of man) · Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, sect. VIII, part I (the uniformity of human actions)

Senecainferable

Man is by nature a being of reason, made to live according to the and for the society of his fellows: virtue fulfils that nature, it does not thwart it. Vices and passions stem from a reason gone astray rather than from a cultural second nature, a naturalist position.

Letters to Lucilius, LXXVI (man's proper good is reason) · On Anger, II, 31 (man is born for mutual aid)

Benthaminferable

Human nature reduces, for Bentham, to a constant and universal datum: sensitivity to pleasure and pain, the mainspring of all conduct in every place and time. It is on this natural footing, not on variable cultural determinations, that he founds his science of legislation, placing him clearly on the side of anthropological naturalism.

An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, ch. I (the two sovereign masters, constant for all)

Marcus Aureliusinferable

Man is by nature a being of made for society; virtue fulfils that nature, and vice is but a straying from it, not an acquired second nature. A naturalist position, in which living according to nature and living according to reason coincide.

Meditations, VIII, 12 · Meditations, V, 1 · Meditations, IV, 29

Rousseauinferable

Nature, for Rousseau, is a norm: natural man, his simple needs and spontaneous feelings serve as the measure for judging social man and his artifices. If education and institutions shape man, they do so by drawing him from a primal goodness that must be recovered, not surpassed. Hence a naturalism in which culture is suspected of denaturing rather than fulfilling.

Rousseau, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality · Rousseau, Emile

Wittgensteininferable

The bedrock where justification ends is the : agreement in language is not an agreement in opinions but an "agreement in form of life", rooted in shared human reactions, "the common behaviour of mankind". His thought thus leans toward a naturalism of shared reactions, without denying the cultural variety of language-games.

Philosophical Investigations, §19, §23, §206, §241

Culturalism

12

What we take for human nature varies profoundly from one society to another: rules, roles, and ways of feeling are cultural constructions. The human is the being with no fixed nature, but with plural cultures.

Explore this position →
Associated figures: Lévi-Strauss · Mead
Who stands here
Sartreexplicit

Sartre denies any human nature: lacking a God to conceive it, there is no common essence fixing in advance what humans are. He does distinguish a human condition, the set of a priori limits of existence (being in the world, laboring there, dying there among others), which is not a given nature but the common frame within which each person makes himself. The position is therefore strongly culturalist, man being what he makes himself, not what he is by nature.

Existentialism Is a Humanism (there is no human nature, but a human condition)

Beauvoirexplicit

Every consciousness, by a movement no sex grounds, sets up before itself an Other it devalues in order to assert itself as the essential one: racism, antisemitism and the oppression of women share this structure. What is peculiar to the feminine condition, and the riddle Beauvoir means to solve, is that women have consented to this role of absolute Other without turning it back, lacking a shared past, solidarity and common labour. The so-called feminine traits are therefore not a nature but the product of this instituted situation, hence a that grants the bodily given without ever letting it settle one's destiny.

The Second Sex (1949), Introduction (woman as "<c>the Other</c>") · The Second Sex, vol. II, "Formative Years"

Marxexplicit

To seek the essence of man in the individual taken apart, as a property he would carry within him, is already to commit 's error: one ascribes to nature what is the effect of a history. Marx therefore shifts the seat of the human outside the individual, into the web of social relations in which he is caught; man distinguishes himself from the animal as soon as he produces his means of subsistence, and changes with the conditions he produces. The consequence is polemical: there is no eternal human nature to invoke against social change, hence a strongly stance, without denying the natural dimension of the producing being.

Theses on Feuerbach, VI · The German Ideology, I (men distinguish themselves as soon as they produce their means of subsistence)

Marxismexplicit

"It is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but, on the contrary, their social being that determines their consciousness": there is no fixed human nature given outside history. Human character, values, and needs are shaped by social conditions and the mode of production, which anchors Marxism on the side of culturalism.

Marx, A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, preface (1859) · Marx and Engels, The German Ideology (1845-1846)

Lockeexplicit

A direct consequence of the : what a man becomes owes far more to education, habit and environment than to any nature given in advance. Locke reckons that nearly all the differences among men come from the upbringing they receive, making him a strong proponent of .

Some Thoughts Concerning Education, §1 ("nine parts of ten are what they are by their education")

Show more (7)
Existentialisminferable

The direct corollary of the thesis of existence without prior essence is the refusal of a fixed human nature determining in advance what we are: man is nothing other than what he makes of himself. What defines us belongs to self-construction and to the historical situation, not to an invariant biological given.

Existentialism Is a Humanism · Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex

Confuciusexplicit

By nature men are close to one another; by practice they grow apart: shared nature is not enough, it is study, habit and the li 禮 (rites) that make the moral difference between men. Confucius stakes everything on formation and culture (wen) more than on an innate endowment, hence a culturalist leaning.

Analects, XVII, 2 (by nature close, by practice far apart) · Analects, XVI, 9 (the grades of knowing: innate, gained by study, gained through difficulty)

Millinferable

For the empiricist Mill, the mind is largely shaped by experience, education and the association of ideas rather than by a fixed nature. In The Subjection of Women he argues that the alleged feminine nature is in fact a product of custom and education: a that makes character a modifiable social construction.

The Subjection of Women, ch. 1 (women's character as a product of upbringing) · A System of Logic, book VI, ch. 4-5 (ethology, the science of the formation of character)

Empiricisminferable

If the mind is at birth a , then character, ideas, and mores are formed by experience, education, and habit. Locke draws from this an entire pedagogy in which people become what education makes them, tilting the school toward cultural shaping rather than a fixed innate nature.

Locke, Some Thoughts Concerning Education, §1 · Locke, Essay Concerning Human Understanding, II, 1

Husserlinferable

Husserl steadily opposes the that would treat consciousness as one psychic fact among the facts of nature, answerable to causal laws alone. The he combats is precisely this naturalising of mind. Consciousness has a mode of being of its own, that of meaning and intending, irreducible to the thing: it calls for an eidetic description, not a naturalistic explanation. Without denying that the human being is also a being of nature, he refuses to let spiritual life be absorbed into it.

Philosophy as Rigorous Science (1911)

Romanticisminferable

What makes a human being is not a universal, fixed nature but their language, their traditions, the spirit of the people that formed them: shows that to think, feel and judge are first of all inherited ways. Humanity exists only in the plural of its cultures, and one understands a person only by going back to the genius of their time and place.

Herder, Treatise on the Origin of Language · Herder, Ideas on the Philosophy of the History of Humanity

Michel de Montaigneinferable

Montaigne holds two threads without cutting either. On one side there is indeed a nature, common to all human beings and even shared with the beasts, to which one should "let oneself go" as to a good guide. On the other, what passes for natural is most often the effect of habit: , that "second nature" and "violent and treacherous schoolmistress", shapes our judgments until it passes itself off as nature itself. Hence a central position, leaning slightly toward the weight of the cultural in what we believe innate.

Essays, I, 23, "Of Custom" and III, 13

Youyou have not taken a stand on this axis yet.Locate yourself24 figures · 5 movements mapped
Problems

See the problem map in the Atlas →

Going further

Related problems to broaden toward other axes

All problems →

Quotations
Of all the men we meet with, nine parts of ten are what they are, good or evil, useful or not, by their education.
Locke · Some Thoughts Concerning Education, §1

See in the quotations

The human essence is no abstraction inherent in the isolated individual. In its reality it is the ensemble of social relations.
Marx · Theses on Feuerbach, VI

See in the quotations

By nature men are close to one another; through practice they grow far apart.
Confucius · Analects, XVII, 2

See in the quotations