The questions

Relation to the world· Work and technologycoredifficulty

Relation to technology

Does technological progress improve the human condition?

Each new tool frees us from old burdens, but breeds dependencies and powers we barely control; does technology serve our ends, or silently transform our desires and even who we are? To take a position is to say whether technical progress is a promise to seize or a hold to keep watch over.

Techno-optimismTechno-criticismInstrumentalism
The poles, and who holds them

Techno-optimism

6

Technology is the great lever of human progress: it frees us from need, pushes back suffering, and extends our power over nature. The problems it creates call for more ingenuity, not a step backward.

Explore this position →
Associated figures: Bacon · Condorcet
Who stands here
Baconexplicit

Knowledge is worth not for contemplation but for its fruits: to know causes is to be able to produce effects, and the measure of a truth is the work it makes possible. Bacon judges this by the mechanical arts, which have grown without cease while the philosophy of the schools stood still: printing, gunpowder, and the compass have changed the world more than all the systems. Technology is thus no suspect by-product of knowledge but its legitimate end and the lever of human progress, against the resignation that holds the present condition to be beyond improvement.

Novum Organum, I, §3, §81 and §129

Transhumanismexplicit

Technology is neither a neutral tool nor an alienating force, but the chief engine of emancipation from the human condition: what pulled us out of scarcity and disease can free us from our very biological limits. The it raises do not warrant renunciation, but a prudent, steered acceleration. A desirable future is built by pushing back the frontiers of the technically possible, not by distrusting them.

Kurzweil, The Singularity Is Near · Bostrom, Superintelligence

Show more (4)
Descartesinferable

For Descartes, the new science has a practical end: to yield techniques, mechanical arts, and a medicine that would prolong life and relieve the human condition. This optimism in the transformative power of applied knowledge anticipates techno-optimism, though it never forms an explicit thesis about technology as such.

Discourse on Method, VI

The Enlightenmentexplicit

The Encyclopédie performs an unprecedented gesture: bringing the mechanical arts, the trades and the machines into knowledge, on an equal footing with the sciences. Technology is here no mere convenience but a vehicle of emancipation, which lifts man out of misery and need and extends his dominion over nature. Heirs to 's programme, the Enlightenment ties the progress of the arts to the progress of enlightenment: mastering nature and instructing men go together.

Diderot and d'Alembert, Encyclopédie, art. "Art" · Bacon, Novum Organum

Marxisminferable

Marx holds the development of the productive forces to be the motor of historical progress: machinery and large-scale industry create the material conditions for a society of abundance freed from want. Yet under capital, that same machinery intensifies exploitation and alienation: the optimism bears on technology freed from capitalist relations, not on technology as such.

Marx, Capital, vol. I, chapter on machinery and modern industry · Marx and Engels, The Communist Manifesto (1848)

Marxinferable

The development of the productive forces, machinery included, is the motor of history and the material condition of emancipation: large-scale industry creates the means of a society of abundance. Yet under capitalism the machine enslaves the worker and intensifies his exploitation. Marx is thus neither technophobic nor naively optimistic: technology liberates according to the social relations that command it, hence a nuanced optimism.

Capital, vol. I, ch. 15 (machinery and large-scale industry) · Manifesto of the Communist Party, ch. 1 (the revolutionary role of the bourgeoisie and of industry)

Arguments and objections (3)
ArgumentThe great leverHistory shows it: it is technology, not good intentions, that has kept humanity's promises of emancipation. See the page
ObjectionProgress of meansMeasuring progress by the growth of our means is to confuse power with the good life: a means is worth only the end it serves. See the page
ObjectionSolutionismThe optimist files technology's harms under fixable defects, when some are the very point of the device, something the industry that lives on them will not fix on its own. See the page

Instrumentalism

named middle0

Technology is in itself neither blessing nor curse: it is a means, and everything depends on the use we make of it. The same tool can heal or destroy. The real problem is not technology but the ends we set for it and the wisdom of those who wield it.

Explore this position →
Who stands here

No figure stands here, in this slice.

Arguments and objections (3)
ArgumentNot the tool, the useAn instrument takes its meaning from the hand that holds it; to blame the object is to call oneself driven when one has merely given in. See the page
ObjectionAn unequal contestThe freedom of use remains, but it does not carry the weight ascribed to it against vast means tuned to outwit it. See the page
ObjectionNo tool is neutralThe idea of a neutral tool assumes an indifferent means; but a device meant to hold you steers behaviour before one even decides. See the page

Techno-criticism

7

Technology is not a mere neutral tool: it imposes its own logic, transforms our relation to the world, and can dispossess us of what gives existence its value. Its development calls for vigilance, limits, and questioning of ends.

Explore this position →
Associated figures: Heidegger · Ellul · Anders
Who stands here
Laoziexplicit

The refinement of means is for Laozi not progress but a source of agitation and cunning that estranges us from the . His ideal community owns machines and weapons but does not use them: multiplying clever tools breeds artifice and desire, whereas brings one back to essentials. This distrust of instrumental ingenuity, voiced long before and Ellul, makes him a distant ancestor of techno-criticism.

Dao De Jing, ch. 80 · Dao De Jing, ch. 57

Romanticismexplicit

Just as the machine and the factory tear human beings from the land and from craft, Romanticism is the first to name the loss: industrial power is bought at the price of a disenchantment of the world, in which living nature becomes inert matter and the human a cog. already mourns a nature « un-godded » by calculation, curses the « dark Satanic mills ». This protest opens the great lineage of the critique of technology, down to and Ellul.

Schiller, The Gods of Greece · Blake, Milton (preface)

Rousseauexplicit

Crowned in 1750 for defending the paradox that the revival of the sciences and arts has corrupted morals, Rousseau strikes at the Enlightenment's cardinal hope: the progress of knowledge and the arts does not bring moral progress, it erodes it. Luxury and the arts polish appearances while softening souls and masking vices beneath civil exteriors. This is no praise of ignorance, but a refusal of the century's central equation between civilization and the improvement of man.

Rousseau, Discourse on the Sciences and Arts

Show more (4)
Taoisminferable

A primitivist distrust runs through Taoism: contrivances and machines breed the calculating mind and corrupt simplicity. Zhuangzi tells of the old gardener who refuses a water-raising machine, fearing that whoever keeps a machine in his heart loses his native purity; Laozi dreams of a small country where, though tools exist, none would be used.

Zhuangzi, ch. 12 (Heaven and Earth) · Laozi, Dao De Jing, ch. 80

Zhuangziinferable

An old gardener refuses the water-drawing machine he is offered: "whoever uses machines acquires a machine heart," and loses the native purity of the spirit. Zhuangzi's distrust bears not on the tool itself, which he gladly wields in his artisan parables, but on the calculating mind and the cunning the instrument breeds at the expense of the . This critique of the "machine heart" ranks him, like , among the distant ancestors of techno-criticism, but from the inner self rather than the political order.

Zhuangzi, ch. 12 (the gardener and the machine)

Husserlextrapolated

Without thematising technology for its own sake, Husserl prepares its critique: the Galilean mathematisation of nature breeds a "technicisation" of knowledge, in which one manipulates formulae and procedures whose originary meaning has been forgotten, emptied of the intuition that grounded them. This denunciation of a knowledge become pure operative calculation, cut off from its lived ground, foreshadows the techno-criticism will radicalise. A cautious position, drawn from the diagnosis of the Crisis rather than from an explicit philosophy of technology.

The Crisis of the European Sciences, §9

Lucretiusinferable

The arts and inventions, from metalworking to weaving and seafaring, were born of need and experience, and Lucretius describes them without any nostalgia for the savage state. But he sees in them no march toward happiness: the discovery of gold and metals armed war, and luxury inflames the empty desires that nature does not demand. Material progress leaves untouched, indeed worsens, the trouble of soul that philosophy alone soothes, hence a clear reservation about what techniques truly bring.

On the Nature of Things, V, 1241-1457 (metals, war, luxury and the ambivalent progress of the arts)

Arguments and objections (3)
ArgumentTechnology's own logicBecome a system, technology transforms our relation to time and to others without anyone having chosen it, and often irreversibly. See the page
ObjectionThe charge of nostalgiaMistrust of technology repeats an old fear with a dismal track record, and treats users as passive dupes. See the page
ObjectionProving too muchA critique that condemns all technology loses every criterion; to sort the good device from the bad, one must return to uses and ends. See the page
Youyou have not taken a stand on this axis yet.Locate yourself13 figures · 5 movements mapped
Journeys that cross this axis
Problems

See the problem map in the Atlas →

  • Descriptive Question
    Is the tool neutral?

    A tool, we are told, is neither good nor bad in itself, everything depending on its use; but does a weapon, or a news feed engineered to capture the eye, really carry no slope of its own?

    the tool
Going further

Sub-problems to deepen this axis's discussion

  • PrescriptiveVital
    The mastery of nature

    Since Bacon and Descartes, technology has promised to make us "as it were masters and possessors of nature"; it has pushed back hunger and disease, but it also unleashes forces no one governs: is this half-kept mastery on its way, or contradictory in its very principle?

    nature
  • Descriptive
    Power and wisdom

    Technical means accumulate: each generation inherits the machines and knowledge of all those before it; the wisdom to use them, however, cannot be stockpiled and must be won anew by each of us. Is this gap between power and discernment a lag that education could close, or does it widen by its very nature?

    technological civilization
  • PrescriptiveExistential
    The remedy and the poison

    Plato already feared that writing would weaken the very memory it claimed to serve; every tool that extends us relieves us of a capacity, down to the assistant that now thinks in our place: where does service end, where does dispossession begin?

    our faculties
  • PrescriptivePolitical & legal
    Choosing our technologies

    No one voted for the smartphone or for artificial intelligence, yet they reorganize our lives: can the adoption of a technology be a common decision, or is it a force that imposes itself and gets debated only after the fact?

    the adoption of technologies

Related problems to broaden toward other axes

  • PrescriptiveMoral
    Repairing or enhancing the human

    When technology no longer transforms the world but its author, healing shades into enhancing: that threshold is a question in its own right.

    the human body
  • PrescriptiveExistential
    Captured attention

    When entire devices are designed to capture every available minute, is diverting oneself still a choice one owns, or must attention be defended as a scarce good, diversion ceasing to be an art the moment it is administered?

    attention-capturing devicesAttention and diversion
  • PracticalExistential
    Reclaiming attention

    Faced with devices designed to capture it, can we really reclaim our attention by working at it, withdrawing, fasting from the feed, returning to the present, or do such techniques only paper over a trouble far larger than us?

    the exercise of attentionAttention and diversion
  • PrescriptivePolitical & legal
    Progress, chosen or imposed?

    Technology transforms society whether we will it or not: is "progress" then a political decision, or a force that carries us along without our having voted for it?

    technological changeTradition and transformation
  • PrescriptiveVital
    The domination of nature

    To command nature by understanding it has pushed back hunger and disease; but does the will to dominate it not turn into the domination of humankind, reducing the world to a mere stock on call? Does mastery emancipate, or does it impoverish both nature and ourselves?

    nature as a resourceHumanity's place in nature

All problems →

Quotations
Human knowledge and human power meet in one, for where the cause is not known the effect cannot be produced.
Bacon · Novum Organum, I, §3

See in the quotations

Our souls have grown corrupt in proportion as our sciences and arts have advanced toward perfection.
Rousseau · Discourse on the Sciences and Arts (1750)

See in the quotations

The more clever tools there are, the more the state sinks into disorder.
Laozi · Dao De Jing, ch. 57

See in the quotations

Whoever uses machines does all his work mechanically; whoever does his work mechanically grows a machine heart.
Zhuangzi · ch. 12

See in the quotations