The questions

Relation to others· Society and historycoredifficulty

Tradition and transformation

Should we preserve the legacy of our institutions, or transform society in the name of progress?

The past hands down an experience no one designed alone, but also injustices no one dares touch any longer; reform can liberate, or undo what worked for reasons we never grasped. To take a position is to say where to place our trust: in what has lasted, or in our power to remake it better.

ConservatismProgressivism
The poles, and who holds them

Conservatism

8

Inherited institutions condense an accumulated wisdom that no individual reason can replace. Reforms must be prudent and gradual: seeking to refound everything at once risks destroying fragile and precious balances.

Explore this position →
Associated figures: Burke · Montesquieu
Who stands here
Confuciusexplicit

The premise is that the was already fully realized by the sage-kings and the li 禮 (rites) of the Zhou dynasty, and that the disorder of the age stems from their decay, not from a want of novelty. If the good has an accomplished precedent, the rational task is to restore and transmit it, not to invent: to call oneself a transmitter and not a maker is therefore not modesty but a thesis, the refusal to ground the norm in present invention. The normative reference is the exemplary past, which makes him a in the strong sense, against any faith in progress.

Analects, VII, 1 (I transmit and do not create, I love and trust the Ancients) · Analects, III, 14 (Confucius follows the Zhou)

Confucianismexplicit

Human order has already been realized once, by the sage-kings of antiquity (Yao, Shun, the Zhou): there is therefore an accomplished model to recover, not a Way to invent from scratch. The present is in disorder precisely because it has broken with that model, hence the task: to transmit and revive the inherited rites (li 禮) rather than replace them. This trust in the legacy sets Confucianism apart both from naturalism, which would undo the artifice of the rites to recover the spontaneity of the , and from innovation, which grounds order on new laws indifferent to the past. For the Confucian, moral authority is not decreed: it is received from a tested tradition.

Confucius, Analects (Lunyu), 7.1 · Confucius, Analects (Lunyu), 3.14

Michel de Montaigneexplicit

If our laws rest not on reason but on , the reformer who would remake them in the name of truth risks, in shaking the edifice, more harm than he cures, as the Wars of Religion show. Montaigne draws from this a paradoxical conservatism: one should obey the laws "because they are laws", not because they are just, for their authority lies in their antiquity, not in their foundation. This is not love of the established order but distrust of novelties, whose certain cost outweighs their uncertain gain. A skeptic in politics is readily conservative, for want of any certainty to justify the risk of change.

Essays, III, 13, "Of Experience" and I, 23, "Of Custom"

Show more (5)
Schopenhauerinferable

No faith in moral progress or political reform: human nature does not change, only the muzzle can be better or worse fitted, and history merely varies the same. Frightened by the 1848 revolution, he lent his opera glass to the soldiers taking aim at the rioters and left part of his fortune to the fund for wounded soldiers, a gesture in which his pessimism turns frankly counter-revolutionary.

Parerga and Paralipomena; correspondence and biography

Sextus Empiricusinferable

Having no truth in whose name to reform the established order, the skeptic regulates himself by default on the laws, customs and received institutions of his country, which he observes without dogmatic belief. This conformism is conservative by abstention rather than conviction: not love of tradition, but the absence of any criterion that would justify overturning it. The position thus leans conservative, but without the value-grounding a Burke would give it.

Outlines of Pyrrhonism, I, 17 and 23-24 (following law and custom)

Humeextrapolated

Holding the established order to be a product of custom and tested utility, Hume distrusts reforms driven by abstract principles and enthusiasms (religious or factious enthusiasm). Without being a reactionary, he prizes the stability of institutions and prudence: a rather conservative sensibility, wary of abrupt change.

Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary (esp. "Of the Original Contract" and "Of the Rise and Progress of the Arts and Sciences")

Laoziinferable

Laozi does not believe history climbs toward the better: the proper movement of the Dao is return, and civilization has made the human fall from his original simplicity. But his aim is not the conservation of institutions, rites and hierarchies, which he criticizes just as much: it is a primitivism that would go back behind tradition itself, which places him on the side of refusing progress without making him a conservator of established forms.

Dao De Jing, ch. 18, 19 and 38 · Dao De Jing, ch. 16 and 25

Rousseauinferable

Rousseau is neither a progressive who expects salvation from civilization, nor a conservative who venerates established tradition. He rejects the century's central idea that the progress of enlightenment carries that of morals, and takes natural man as a critical yardstick for the present; yet he calls for a radical political refounding, not the maintenance of the old order. Hence a position drawn back from Enlightenment progressivism, without tipping into conservatism.

Rousseau, Discourse on the Sciences and Arts · Rousseau, The Social Contract

Progressivism

12

Societies can and must improve: reason allows us to identify inherited injustices and to correct them. Tradition carries no authority in itself; what matters is the emancipation and betterment of humanity.

Explore this position →
Associated figures: Condorcet · Marx
Who stands here
Marxexplicit

Marx calls not for gradual reform but for a revolutionary overturning of the social order: the proletariat must overthrow the bourgeois state and abolish existing relations of production: a radical , hostile to any conservation of the established order.

Manifesto of the Communist Party, conclusion · Theses on Feuerbach, XI (changing the world)

Marxismexplicit

If exploitation lies in the very structure of the relations of production, then reform can only manage it: only their overthrow abolishes it. Hence the revolutionary character of Marxist progressivism and its refusal of the alternatives: neither awaiting a moral evolution, nor the ideal cities of utopian socialism, nor mere philosophical critique will do, since to interpret the world leaves it intact. Thought itself has worth only as , a moment of real transformation borne by the class that has "nothing to lose but its chains." Philosophy ceases to be contemplation and becomes a weapon, as the eleventh thesis on Feuerbach sums up.

Marx, Theses on Feuerbach, XI (1845) · Marx and Engels, The Communist Manifesto (1848)

Transhumanismexplicit

Transhumanism carries the 's faith in progress to its limit: not only knowledge and institutions, but the human being itself can and must be improved. No tradition, no inherited order holds an authority that would withstand a demonstrable improvement; the past is merely a starting point that reason and technology are meant to surpass.

More, 'The Extropian Principles' · Condorcet, Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind (lineage)

Beauvoirexplicit

Beauvoir is resolutely emancipatory: The Second Sex is a call to transform the structures that make woman the Other, and her engagement (feminism, anticolonialism, support for liberation struggles) aims at abolishing inherited oppressions. The traditions that fix roles are, for her, alienation, not an order to be conserved.

The Second Sex (1949), perspective of liberation · Force of Circumstance (1963), political engagements

Benthamexplicit

Bentham judges institutions by their present utility alone, never by their antiquity: law must be methodically reformed, statutes codified, irrational survivals abolished. A radical reformer of the penal and carceral system (the Panopticon project), he denounces the nonsense of the common law and campaigns for a rational recasting of the codes. This is an avowed reformist progressivism.

A Fragment on Government (critique of Blackstone and the common law) · Panopticon, or the Inspection-House

Millexplicit

A committed reformer, Mill sees in the progress of humanity the horizon of morals and politics. He campaigns for the extension of the suffrage, popular education, social reform and, in The Subjection of Women, for the emancipation of women, which he also carries into Parliament. Freedom of thought matters precisely because it is the engine of human improvement.

The Subjection of Women (1869), ch. 1 (sexual equality as a demand of progress) · On Liberty, ch. 2 (freedom of opinion as a condition of progress)

Show more (6)
The Enlightenmentexplicit

From the accumulation of knowledge and the spread of enlightenment the current draws a new thesis: humanity advances, and that march can be conscious and willed. Institutions and laws are not sacred merely for being old; they must prove their present usefulness, failing which reform is legitimate. pushes the idea to a law of history, the human mind progressing by stages toward truth, liberty and happiness. Against this creed will set the accumulated wisdom of tradition: this is the birth certificate of the divide between progressivism and conservatism.

Condorcet, Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind · Turgot, On the Successive Advances of the Human Mind

Baconinferable

Against the prejudice that reveres Antiquity as the age of wisdom, Bacon reverses the argument: the Ancients were the youth of the world, and it is we, coming after so many accumulated centuries, who are the true elders. The authority of the received masters has therefore no value in itself; knowledge is not an inheritance to preserve but an open building site, indefinitely perfectible. This trust in the reforming power of reason holds first for the sciences; in politics, the great servant of the Crown remained cautious, which holds the score back from the extreme.

Novum Organum, I, §84 · The Advancement of Learning, I

Pragmatismexplicit

Meliorism holds the world to be neither fatally good nor fatally bad, but improvable through intelligent effort: this drives Dewey's reformism, which invests education and democracy as levers of gradual, experimental progress. Society is not an order to be preserved but a project to be revised without end, through trial, error and correction.

Dewey, The Public and Its Problems (1927) · James, Pragmatism (1907), lecture VIII

Kantexplicit

Enlightenment is the human being's emergence from his self-incurred immaturity. Kant makes the free public use of reason the engine of a gradual progress of humanity, placing him clearly on the progressist side.

An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?

Utilitarianismexplicit

Utilitarianism was born as a reformist program: subjected law, prisons and institutions to the test of utility, rejecting respect for tradition as such. extended this drive toward emancipation, notably of women. Institutions are worth only the well-being they produce, which licenses reforming them as soon as they fall short.

Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation · Mill, The Subjection of Women

Lockeinferable

By justifying the right of resistance and the revocability of government, Locke gives the Glorious Revolution its theory and breaks with the order of divine right. His confidence in the growth of knowledge through experience and in the reform of education places him on the reforming side, without revolutionary radicalism, hence a moderately progressive value.

Two Treatises of Government, II, ch. 19 (the dissolution of government)

Youyou have not taken a stand on this axis yet.Locate yourself20 figures · 6 movements mapped
Problems

See the problem map in the Atlas →

  • Descriptive Thought experiment
    The wisdom of ages, or reason?

    Does the inherited order condense a knowledge no individual reason can match, calling for prudence, or can reason audit institutions and correct the injustice that has crept into them?

    the inherited order
Going further

Sub-problems to deepen this axis's discussion

  • PrescriptivePolitical & legal
    Is what lasts thereby good?

    Does an institution's endurance prove its worth, what has held having proven itself, or does "it has always been so" also shelter injustices that have lasted just as long?

    a tradition
  • PrescriptivePolitical & legal
    Reform or refound?

    Even when change is called for, should we reform step by step, at the risk of a slowness that lets injustice endure, or refound all at once, at the risk of undoing balances we never understood?

    social change
  • PrescriptivePolitical & legal
    The living, or the inheritance?

    Do the living have the right to rewrite what the dead built, "the earth belongs to the living", or are we the trustees of a legacy we must hand on to the generations to come?

    the generations

Related problems to broaden toward other axes

  • Descriptive
    Does history move toward the better?

    Progressivism assumes change tends toward the better, but does history have a direction, or is "progress" sometimes another name for a loss?

    the course of history
  • PrescriptivePolitical & legal
    Progress, chosen or imposed?

    Technology transforms society whether we will it or not: is "progress" then a political decision, or a force that carries us along without our having voted for it?

    technological change
  • PrescriptivePolitical & legal
    Choosing our technologies

    No one voted for the smartphone or for artificial intelligence, yet they reorganize our lives: can the adoption of a technology be a common decision, or is it a force that imposes itself and gets debated only after the fact?

    the adoption of technologiesRelation to technology
  • PrescriptiveExistential
    The weight of heritage

    We are heirs: does fidelity to roots, to debts, to the dead make the depth of a life, or a chain that shuts the living inside a past that is over? For too much memory, too, can paralyze.

    what we have receivedTemporal orientation

All problems →

Quotations
I transmit and do not create; I love the Ancients and trust them.
Confucius · Analects, VII, 1

See in the quotations

The perfectibility of man is truly indefinite; and the progress of this perfectibility has no other limit than the duration of the globe on which nature has placed us.
Condorcet · Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind (1795)

See in the quotations

Laws keep their credit not because they are just, but because they are laws.
Michel de Montaigne · Essays, III, 13, "Of Experience"

See in the quotations

The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it.
Marx · Theses on Feuerbach, XI (1845)

See in the quotations

The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.
Marx · Manifesto of the Communist Party, 1848

See in the quotations

Sapere aude! Have courage to use your own understanding: this is the motto of the Enlightenment.
Kant · An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?

See in the quotations