← Back to the axis

Relation to others· Bonds

Truthful rigorism

Axis: SincerityIs it sometimes permissible to lie for someone else's good?

The duty to tell the truth is unconditional: lying, even out of kindness, destroys the trust that makes all speech possible and treats the other person as someone to be manipulated. No good intention can turn a lie into a right action.

Who holds this position

Movements 1

Cynicismexplicit

If social shame is only nomos, then to keep it quiet or humour it is to become complicit in the collective lie on which conventions rest. Hence two bound demands. (frank speech) requires telling the truth without circumlocution or flattery, even to the faces of the powerful, for whom deference has become an entitlement: it is, Diogenes answered, the finest thing men possess. Anaideia (deliberate shamelessness) is its proof by deed: to perform in public, without blushing, what accepted modesty forbids is to demonstrate experimentally that this modesty had no natural ground. Cynic frankness is thus no gratuitous coarseness but a method of refutation, which takes the body and the scandal as its arguments.

Diogenes Laertius, Lives, VI, 69

Philosophers 9

Diogenes of Sinopeexplicit

If social shame is only , to keep it quiet is to become complicit in the collective lie on which conventions rest. Hence two bound demands. (frank speech) requires telling the truth without circumlocution or flattery, even to the faces of the powerful: asked what is the finest thing among men, Diogenes answered, frank speech. (deliberate shamelessness) is its proof by deed: to perform in public, without blushing, what accepted modesty forbids is to demonstrate experimentally that this modesty had no natural ground. Cynic frankness is thus no gratuitous coarseness but a method of refutation that takes the body and the scandal as its arguments.

Diogenes Laertius, Lives, VI, 69

Kantexplicit

Against , Kant maintains that truthfulness is an unconditional duty, even toward the murderer asking where one's friend is hiding: lying would destroy the foundation of all right. This is the textbook case of truth-telling rigorism.

On a Supposed Right to Lie from Philanthropy

Beauvoirexplicit

Beauvoir takes up the existentialist critique of : lying to oneself to flee one's freedom and responsibility. consists in lucidly assuming the ambiguity of the human condition, without taking refuge in a fixed role, in the seriousness of ready-made values, or in the image one presents to others. Truthfulness toward oneself is a strong moral requirement.

The Ethics of Ambiguity (1947), figures of evasion (the serious man, the sub-man)

Sartreexplicit

poses a puzzle: to lie one must know the truth one hides, yet here deceiver and deceived are one and the same. Sartre resolves it through the non-coincidence of the for-itself: not being a thing, I can flee myself by playing at being one, like the café waiter who makes himself wholly a « café waiter ». To fail in this way is to refuse one's own freedom.

Being and Nothingness, Part 1, ch. 2 (bad faith, the café waiter)

Confuciusexplicit

The argument starts from a function of language: a name ("father", "ruler", "friend") does not merely label, it prescribes a duty bound to the role. A word misused, or belied by deeds, therefore unsettles the very order it was meant to uphold, and zhengming (the rectification of names) becomes the condition of a working society. Truthfulness ceases to be a private matter of conscience: trustworthiness of speech (xin) and sincerity (cheng) are demanded because lying and the gap between word and deed dissolve the social fabric. Hence a rigorism of truthfulness, in which the junzi 君子 (person of noble character) is ashamed when his words outrun his deeds.

Analects, XIII, 3 (the rectification of names) · Analects, XIV, 27 (the junzi is ashamed when his words exceed his deeds)

Michel de Montaigneexplicit

Lying is for Montaigne the vice he most detests: "we are men, and hold together, only by our word", and whoever lies betrays the social bond at its heart. The whole enterprise of the is itself a wager of frankness, to show himself "wholly and entirely naked", without disguise. This demand for truthfulness remains, however, that of a tolerant sage, not of an inflexible rigorism: it aims at good faith more than at the avowal of every truth in every circumstance.

Essays, I, 9, "Of Liars" and II, 18, "Of Giving the Lie"

Show inferred positions (3)
Epictetusinferable

The one making progress must be of unfailing integrity, matching deeds to judgments and not adorning oneself with what one is not. This demand for inner consistency leans clearly toward a rigorism of truthfulness.

Enchiridion, §46 · Enchiridion, §48

Lockeinferable

Locke's toleration rests on the idea that sincere cannot be coerced: inner assent must follow conviction, never dissimulation or forced profession. This demand for inner truthfulness, joined to his evidentialist rule, inclines him toward a rigorism of sincerity, though he does not thematize a casuistry of lying as such.

A Letter Concerning Toleration (forced faith is no faith)

Millinferable

Truthfulness ranks among the rules of highest utility, for mutual trust is the foundation of social well-being, and to weaken it harms all. Mill thus holds lying to be gravely harmful; but, utility remaining the ultimate criterion, he admits rare recognised exceptions, which keeps him clearly, without absolutism, on the side of truthful rigorism.

Utilitarianism, ch. 2 (veracity, a rule of transcendent utility, and its exceptions)

Characters 2

Meursaultexplicit

When Marie asks whether he loves her, Meursault simply answers that he probably does not, rather than saying what she hopes to hear; he plays no grief at his mother's funeral and admits he would rather not have seen her dead. He can no more cheat to save himself than to please: to say what he feels, and nothing else, is for him a necessity stronger than his own interest.

Part I, chapter 4: to Marie asking whether he loves her, he answers that it means nothing, but probably not · Part I, chapters 1-2: the absence of any feigned grief at his mother's funeral

Antigoneexplicit

Antigone refuses all concealment: she orders Ismene to proclaim her deed to the whole city rather than keep it silent, performs the second rite in broad daylight, and confesses without evasion before Creon. The prudent lie, even a protective one, is hateful to her.

Prologue: she demands that Ismene shout the deed to all instead of hiding it · First and second episodes: caught in the act in daylight, she confesses at once

Arguments and objections
ArgumentThe argument from trustLying exploits the trust that grounds all speech; allow one exception, and the presumption of sincerity crumbles.
  1. When I speak, I tacitly ask the other to believe me; all communication rests on this presumption of sincerity.
  2. To lie is to exploit that trust in order to lead the other where they would not go if they knew: I then treat them as a to my ends.
  3. Allow a single exception, and everyone starts to dread the lie told "for their own good": the presumption of sincerity crumbles, and with it the bond that speech weaves.

Therefore The duty of truthfulness is therefore without exception, for it protects not an abstract rule, but the very trust on which our relationships live.

See the page
ObjectionHonesty without regardA truth that spares no one is not a virtue, but a hardness.
  1. Telling the whole truth in every circumstance can inflict a pain that nothing warrants: on someone dying, on a child, on anyone who can no longer change their lot.
  2. To hold to the principle when frankness only wounds is to prefer the purity of a rule to the very person it is meant to serve.
  3. Yet compassion ranks among our duties as much as truthfulness; to set them against each other without remainder is to sacrifice one to the other without admitting it.

Therefore An honesty that allows itself no tact ends up confusing uprightness with indifference.

See the page
ObjectionThe arbitrary lineBetween lying and letting someone believe, the line you draw is less clear than it seems.
  1. Rigorism forbids the lie, yet permits staying silent, being evasive, letting a false impression settle in.
  2. But a calculated silence or a half-truth can deceive just as surely as a lie, and with the same intent to mislead.
  3. To save the word this way while absolving the manoeuvre is to preserve the letter of sincerity while sacrificing its spirit.

Therefore If deceiving by silence is allowed and deceiving by words forbidden, then it is the intent to deceive, and not the lie alone, that ought to be at issue.

See the page
Practices
Cynic frankness (parrhēsia)RuleAttested · Diogenes

Say the useful truth, not the pleasing flattery.

practised , frank speech: telling the useful truth without servility, even before the powerful. The rule is, in those moments when you would be tempted to please, to say what is true and useful rather than what flatters, so as to deflate a pretension or an illusion. Today it is an antidote to the flattery and conformism that make us silence what matters.

Unlock the practices

The step-by-step routine is part of Premium access: a modest contribution that supports and encourages the development of Philoscopia. Everything encyclopedic stays free and open source — this only opens the actionable practices.

Discover Premium access

Already unlocked on another device? Sign in to restore it.

Truthful without woundingRuleProposed · Kant

Never say what is false; but not telling all remains permitted.

For , lying, even out of kindness, ruins the trust on which all speech rests. But to be truthful never meant telling everything, nor bludgeoning bluntly. This rule holds truthfulness in daily life: before the temptation of a comforting lie, you seek the true word that respects the other, and you keep ever clear the line between staying silent and deceiving. It helps sustain relationships where your word can be believed, without wounding for no reason.

Unlock the practices

The step-by-step routine is part of Premium access: a modest contribution that supports and encourages the development of Philoscopia. Everything encyclopedic stays free and open source — this only opens the actionable practices.

Discover Premium access

Already unlocked on another device? Sign in to restore it.