← Back to the axis

Relation to others· Morals

The law of reason

Axis: The source of moralityWhat gives morality its authority?

Moral obligation holds for every rational being: a demand that reason discovers or gives itself, like a truth that depends on no decree. Believer or not, whoever reasons runs up against the same duties; it is the universality of reason, not a higher will, that gives morality its force.

Who holds this position

Philosophers 1

Show inferred positions (1)
Hegelinferable

The question here is no longer what makes an action good, but where morality draws its authority. Against the command of a transcendent God as against the purely formal law of reason, and without reducing to sentiment, Hegel roots obligation in reason become concrete: spirit objectified in the mores and institutions of a community, the Sitten from which takes its name. The authority of the good is thus immanent and historical, yet rational, not an arbitrary and revisable convention.

Elements of the Philosophy of Right, §142-156 (mores, Sittlichkeit)

Problems
  • Descriptive Question
    The Euthyphro dilemma

    Is the good good because God wills it, or does God will it because it is good? One branch makes morality arbitrary, the other seems to make it independent of God; theologians have been seeking a way between the two ever since.

    God's relation to the good
  • Descriptive Question
    Without God, is everything permitted?

    If no transcendent guarantor upholds our duties, do they keep their binding force, or do they become choices that can always be undone? Secularized societies put the phrase to the test every day.

    morality without a guarantor
  • Descriptive
    Can a feeling bind?

    Observing that nature made us compassionate states a fact; concluding that we ought to be so crosses the step from is to ought. If morality is only a feeling, what do we say to someone who does not feel it?

    the authority of a feeling