The questions

Relation to oneself· Existencecoredifficulty

The meaning of life

How should we respond to the enigma of life's meaning?

The enigma is a common one: the meaning of life does not show itself, and everyone knows hours of disorientation when nothing seems to point to it. If there is a meaning, it must be sought and deciphered; if there is none, what remains is to create it, to revolt, or to give it up. To take a position is to say what attitude to hold in the face of this obscurity, and what can give our days their worth.

100
100
95
5
90
10
90
10
85
15
85
10
5
85
5
10
85
15
85
10
5
80
20
5
95
5
85
10
85
15
85
15
75
25
10
90
20
80
5
10
85
The poles, and who holds them

Teleology and providence

25

Meaning exists, but it does not give itself at once: existence belongs to a world order or a providential design that must be learned and deciphered. Faced with the enigma, the task is to seek that purpose, to trust it even while it remains obscure, and to align one's conduct with it.

Explore this position →
Associated figures: the Stoics · Christianity
Who stands here
Platoexplicit

The whole order of things is directed toward the Good, the principle and end of all reality: in the the Demiurge fashions the world as beautiful and good as possible by looking to the eternal model. Human life finds its meaning in this cosmic teleology, by becoming as far as possible like the divine and the order of the whole.

Timaeus, 29d-30c, 47a-c · Republic, VI, 505a-b

Plotinusexplicit

The very movement of being is circular: each thing proceeds from the by and then tends to return to it, and the return () is inscribed in the nature of whatever issues from the Good. The meaning of human life is therefore neither to be invented nor absent: it is given by this structure, the soul having consciously to retrace the path to its source. To live fully is to convert one's gaze, to turn away from the outside and climb back toward the origin from which one is never wholly cut off.

Enneads, VI, 9 · Enneads, V, 1

Thomas Aquinasexplicit

The meaning of life is for Thomas given, inscribed in a that orders every being to its end: the human being is created to know and love God, and all his existence finds its direction in this return toward its origin. A slight constructive part remains, since it falls to each one to cooperate freely with this end through his acts, but the fundamental orientation is neither invented nor absurd, it is received from a willed order.

Summa contra Gentiles, III, 25 and 37

Stoicismexplicit

The cosmos is a single living being pervaded by the , the divine reason; man is a part of it endowed with a fragment of that reason. « Living according to nature » therefore means living according to reason, one's own and that of the whole, which coincides with virtue. The meaning of existence is not to be invented: it lies in the right place one holds within the rational order, against an Epicurean world of indifferent atoms.

Marcus Aurelius, Meditations · Cicero, On the Nature of the Gods, book II

Vedānta (Advaita)explicit

If the Self is already and has fallen into saṃsāra only through error, then the end of existence is not a goal to be invented but a truth to be recovered: meaning is inscribed in the structure of the real, and life has for its term , the conscious return of the Self to what it has never ceased to be. This spiritual teleology marks itself off on two fronts: against the absurdity of an existence without direction, it posits an objective end; but against the ritualism of Mīmāṃsā, which made meaning the correct performance of Vedic acts for the sake of future fruits, it objects that no action, by nature productive of fruits and so of fresh karman, can liberate: only the knowledge of what is already accomplished can.

Śaṅkara, Commentary on the Brahma-Sūtras (Brahma-Sūtra-Bhāṣya), I, 1, 4 · Kaṭha Upaniṣad

Aristotleexplicit

From the general finalism follows a consequence for human existence: what holds for the eye or the plant holds for the human, who likewise has a proper function (ergon) inscribed in its nature. The meaning of life is accordingly neither received from elsewhere nor freely invented: it is to be actualized from a nature already oriented toward its end, rational activity. Hence the leaning toward a given meaning, while leaving each individual the task of bringing into act what is at first only in potency.

Nicomachean Ethics, I.7 (the function argument) · Physics, II.8

Show more (19)
Marcus Aureliusexplicit

The cosmos is a whole ordered by the , and man, a fragment of that reason, holds his place and function within it: to live well is to fall in with it. Yet Marcus introduces an un-Stoic note, the « providence or atoms » alternative he keeps turning over: either the world is , or it is no more than a swirl of atoms, and in either case the wise man must keep his soul upright. He always comes down on the side of rational order, but this recurring hypothesis betrays a restless lucidity that sets him apart from the doctrinal serenity of .

Meditations, IV, 4 · Meditations, IX, 28 · Meditations, XII, 14

Senecaexplicit

The world is a cosmos ordered by a providential reason (), and the meaning of human life is to live in accordance with that rational nature. Man's end, as a fragment of the divine whole, is inscribed in the order of things: a cosmic teleology grounds ethics.

On the Happy Life, III (living according to nature) · On Providence, I and V (the providential order of the world)

Epictetusexplicit

The world is ordered by a rational and every being has an assigned role in it, which reason allows us to recognize and fulfill. A constructive part remains, since it falls to each of us to play the received role well, like an actor in a play.

Discourses, I.16 · Enchiridion, §17

Leibnizinferable

For Leibniz, this world is the best of all possible worlds, chosen by God among the infinity of possibles according to the principle of the best. Nothing happens in it without a sufficient reason, and each substance, through pre-established harmony, contributes to the order and perfection of the whole. Life draws its meaning from this providential purpose that envelops it, to be recognized rather than invented.

Theodicy · Monadology, §§ 53-60

Aristotelianisminferable

The meaning of existence is teleological: since every being tends toward its proper end, human life finds its meaning in the actualization of its function, the life according to reason, whose summit is contemplative activity. Meaning is therefore neither wholly self-constructed nor absurd, but inscribed in the very nature of the human being.

Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, X, 7-8

Platonismexplicit

Platonism is fundamentally teleological (explaining beings by the end, the telos, toward which they tend): the world is ordered by the Demiurge for the best, after the model of the Forms, and everything tends toward the Good as toward its end. Human existence finds its meaning in this orientation of the soul toward the principle that orders the whole.

Plato, Timaeus, 29d-30c, the ordering of the world · Plato, Republic, 505a-509c, the Good as end

The Buddhainferable

Existence has an assignable end and a directed meaning: to be freed from suffering and the cycle of rebirths so as to reach (the going-out of greed, hatred, and delusion). The whole path is ordered toward this goal, giving the teaching a teleological structure, even though the end is set not by a creator but discovered as the nature of things.

Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta, Saṃyutta Nikāya 56.11 (the sermon at Benares) · Dhammapada, ch. XXVI (The Brahmin)

Śaṅkarainferable

Existence belongs to an order whose end is fixed in advance: to leave the cycle of rebirths and recover the identity of the self and . Meaning is not an arbitrary creation of the individual but the recognition of a truth already there, veiled by ignorance; every life is oriented, whether it knows it or not, toward this liberation. A measure of personal journeying remains, since it falls to each to walk the path, but the end is not invented: it is discovered.

Commentary on the Bhagavad Gītā · Upadeśasāhasrī

Buddhisminferable

Since the cessation of suffering is possible, it gives existence an end toward which everything is ordered: to be freed from the cycle of rebirths so as to reach (the going-out of greed, hatred, and delusion). Meaning is therefore neither invented by each person nor decreed by a creator, unlike ends fixed by a God: it is discovered as the very nature of things, which gives Buddhism a teleological structure without transcendence, the goal lying in the possibility of extinction rather than in any external will.

Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta (the sermon at Benares) · Dhammapada, ch. XXVI (The Brahmin)

Nāgārjunainferable

Like all of , Madhyamaka orders existence toward an assignable end: liberation from suffering through the understanding of . This end is set not by a creator but discovered as the nature of things, hence a teleological structure, which the identity of saṃsāra and brings back entirely into this very world.

Mūlamadhyamakakārikā (Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way), ch. XXV (the examination of nirvāṇa)

Socratesinferable

Socrates takes his calling to examine men as a mission entrusted to him by the god, one he cannot desert: he is stationed in Athens as at a post of battle one does not leave. The meaning of his life is thus given by a divine command, and the gods do not neglect the good man: far from a constructed meaning or an absurd universe, a watches over it.

Plato, Apology, 28d-29a (the post assigned by the god) · Plato, Apology, 41c-d (the gods' care for the good man)

Taoisminferable

For Taoism, the Tao is the source and order of all things, the spontaneous course to which existence belongs. Meaning is not invented but found by attuning oneself to this course through wu-wei and simplicity, renouncing the artificial ends man forges for himself. To live well is to wed a fabric that precedes and exceeds us, yet without the personal design of a god.

Laozi, Tao Te Ching · Zhuangzi

Lockeinferable

A Christian, Locke holds man to be the workmanship and property of God, set in the world to fulfill his ends according to the natural law that reason illumines. This providential frame gives life its direction; but Locke joins to it a large human share, the free pursuit of happiness and the care of oneself, which does not await its meaning from a revelation.

Second Treatise of Government, II · Essay concerning Human Understanding, II, 21

Confuciusinferable

Meaning, for Confucius, is rooted in the Mandate of Heaven (Tian ming): a normative order, a Way that surpasses the individual and to which one must attune one's conduct. But this order is fulfilled only through human effort, self-cultivation, the rites and the justice of relationships: life takes on meaning by realizing, here below, the share that falls to us in the harmony willed by Heaven.

Analects (Lunyu), II.4 and XVI.8

Confucianisminferable

Confucianism sets meaning within the Mandate of Heaven, a normative order and Way that surpass the individual; but this order holds only as accomplished in self-cultivation, the rites and the rectitude of human relationships. Meaning is thus received from a heavenly order and realized through ethical effort, never left to individual choice alone nor held to be absent.

Analects (Lunyu) · Doctrine of the Mean (Zhongyong)

Romanticisminferable

The world is neither an indifferent mechanism nor an absurd chaos: it is shot through with a meaning, a spirit unfolding within it to which the human being is called to respond. The Romantic feeling of the infinite and the longing for a lost unity presuppose that existence has a direction and a depth, however veiled: meaning is not to be invented from nothing but to be sensed and recovered in nature, art and history.

Novalis, The Novices of Sais · Schelling, Ideas for a Philosophy of Nature

Descartesinferable

Descartes believes in a provident God and in the immortality of the soul, which set life within a willed order and promise it an end; but he banishes final causes from knowledge, judging divine wisdom impenetrable. Accessible meaning then shifts toward the human: the right use of , the perfection of reason and the contentment of , a work to accomplish more than a purpose to contemplate.

Meditations on First Philosophy, IV · The Passions of the Soul, arts. 153-156

Kantinferable

The meaning of life, for Kant, lies in the moral vocation: to become worthy of happiness by fulfilling the law that reason gives itself, which belongs to autonomy, not to a received end. But the realization of the highest good exceeds our powers and postulates a moral world-order guaranteed by God: a rationally hoped-for providence thus borders autonomy with a teleological horizon.

Critique of Practical Reason, Dialectic · Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim

Rousseauinferable

The Profession of Faith of the Savoyard Vicar affirms a good God, a providence and an immortal soul, and makes conscience the infallible voice of nature within us: a given order, with which the upright life accords. But the most intimate meaning Rousseau finds in the sentiment of existence and the authenticity of the self, recovered far from social artifice, a properly human and inward share.

Emile, IV (Profession of Faith of the Savoyard Vicar) · Reveries of the Solitary Walker

Arguments and objections (2)
ArgumentA meaning you give yourself does not bindA merely decided meaning does not bind me, since I can revoke it; yet a life needs a meaning that surpasses it and that no whim can undo; such a meaning must therefore be discovered, inscribed in an order that precedes us. See the page
ObjectionAttacks the positionThe world does not answerTeleology reads a design into the order of the world; but that order is fully explained by blind processes, and nothing in it points to an end meant for us. The 'found' meaning could be only a projected one. See the page

Constructed meaning

20

If meaning eludes us, it is because none is written into things: there is nothing to discover, everything to make. Faced with the enigma, the answer is to create the significance of one's life through one's choices and projects, and this freedom makes us fully responsible for what we become.

Explore this position →
Associated figures: Sartre
Who stands here
Spinozaexplicit

Spinoza rejects all in Nature: final causes are a human fiction, a projection of our desires onto a world that acts only by the necessity of its nature. Meaning is not given by a cosmic teleology but constructed through the mind's striving toward knowledge and joy.

Ethics, I, appendix (the critique of final causes) · Ethics, IV, preface (good and evil as notions relative to us)

Beauvoirexplicit

In a world without given values or transcendent purpose, existence has no meaning other than the one freedom invents for it through its projects: meaning is constructed, never received. Beauvoir acknowledges the gratuitousness and ambiguity of the human condition, without turning it into a sterile absurd: this void is precisely what makes the creation of meaning both possible and required.

The Ethics of Ambiguity (1947), on the meaning and gratuitousness of existence

Sartreexplicit

No teleology presides over existence: being is first of all contingent, de trop (superfluous), without reason to be, as the nausea of the hero Roquentin reveals. Meaning is therefore neither given nor discovered but constructed through each person's choices and commitments, which invent their own values. A measure of absurdity remains, as the backdrop of this radical contingency, but it is not, as in , the last word.

Nausea (1938), the experience of contingency · Existentialism Is a Humanism (man invents his values)

Existentialismexplicit

Because existence precedes essence, meaning cannot pre-exist the individual who bears it: neither providence, nor nature, nor the progress of History delivers a purpose to life in advance. Yet meaning is not abolished but displaced: it becomes a task, what each person brings about through their commitments. Here the movement parts ways with nihilism as much as with the religions of salvation, for to give up a given meaning is not to conclude to absurdity but to charge the individual with answering, as sets revolt rather than despair against the absence of meaning.

Existentialism Is a Humanism · Simone de Beauvoir, The Ethics of Ambiguity

Nietzscheexplicit

The death of God strips existence of any pre-given end and opens the danger of nihilism, which a share of the reflects. But Nietzsche's answer is the transvaluation of values and the creation of meaning through the : meaning constructed, not discovered. No cosmic teleology is admitted.

The Gay Science, §125 and §301 · Thus Spoke Zarathustra, "On the Thousand and One Goals"

Show more (15)
Benthaminferable

Bentham assigns life no cosmic or providential end: the only meaning is the one measured by the principle of utility, namely to produce happiness and reduce suffering, for oneself and for the greatest number. A wholly immanent significance, anchored in sensibility, without recourse to an order that would surpass us.

Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, I

Utilitarianisminferable

Utilitarianism assigns life no transcendent end: its meaning is measured by the happiness it brings and the suffering it spares, for oneself and for the greatest number. Wholly immanent, this meaning is built in the enlightened pursuit of common welfare, without providential order or the vertigo of nothingness.

Bentham, Principles of Morals and Legislation · Mill, Utilitarianism

Epicurusinferable

Epicurus' gods, blessed and remote, neither govern nor destine anything: no providence assigns life an end. Meaning lies wholly on the human side, in the good life within our reach, ataraxia, friendship and simple, well-measured pleasures. Freed from the fear of the gods and of death, existence finds its sufficiency in itself.

Letter to Menoeceus · Principal Doctrines

Humeinferable

Hume ruins the argument from design and judges providence unknowable: no meaning is legible in the order of things. But he draws from this neither anguish nor revolt: meaning is found at human scale, in the pleasures of sociable life, friendship, activity and useful virtue. An immanent, serene significance that does without a beyond.

Dialogues concerning Natural Religion · An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals

Millinferable

Mill makes meaning depend on no cosmic purpose, which he holds undecidable: he locates it in the development of individuality and in devotion to ends beyond one's own interest, up to the service of humanity. A life has worth through the faculties it unfolds and the good it does, an immanent, cultivated meaning, not received from on high.

On Liberty, III · Utilitarianism, II-III

Empiricisminferable

Empiricism reads in experience no providential end, and holds the argument from design to be fragile (Hume). Meaning is therefore not given but found at human scale: in pleasures, social affections, useful activity and virtue. An immanent, revisable significance, attuned to what experience shows, without anguish or beyond.

Hume, Dialogues concerning Natural Religion · Mill, Utilitarianism

Epicureanisminferable

The Epicurean universe, made of atoms and void, is governed by no purpose or providence: there is no preestablished cosmic meaning. The meaning of existence is therefore to be constructed by the individual, in the pursuit of tranquillity and the cultivation of friendship (philia), without tipping into absurdity, since nature offers a clear criterion, pleasure.

Lucretius, On the Nature of Things, book II · Epicurus, Vatican Sayings, 52

Pragmatisminferable

Pragmatism does not receive meaning from a ready-made order: it is fashioned in action, through the growth of experience and the resolution of problems that make life richer. Dewey rejects fixed ends in favor of an open, meliorist meaning, and James makes confidence in the future a faith that helps to realize it: a human, practical and revisable significance.

Dewey, Reconstruction in Philosophy · James, The Will to Believe

Phenomenologyinferable

Phenomenology holds meaning to be constituted, not found ready-made in things: through intentionality, consciousness gives significance to the world, and Heidegger's Dasein is the being for whom its own being is in question. The meaning of existence is neither inscribed in a cosmic order nor purely absurd: it is won in the way each takes up and unfolds its relation to the world.

Husserl, The Crisis of the European Sciences · Heidegger, Being and Time

Marxinferable

Marx rejects all providence: meaning is not inscribed in a cosmic order, it is worked out in history through human activity. It is in unalienated labor, the transformation of the world and the collective project of emancipation that existence finds its significance. An immanent direction does run through history, but it is the work of human beings, not the design of an instance that surpasses them.

Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 · The German Ideology

The Enlightenmentinferable

The Enlightenment shifts meaning from providence and tradition toward man himself: it is through the public use of reason, the progress of knowledge and autonomy that humanity makes its own history and improves its condition. Even among the deists, the remote God no longer destines: meaning is built here below, through emancipation from tutelage.

Kant, What Is Enlightenment? · Condorcet, Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind

Marxisminferable

Marxism denies any providential finality and locates meaning in history as made by human beings: it is in liberated labor, struggle and the project of a classless society that existence finds its scope. An immanent direction animates history, but it proceeds from material contradictions and collective action, not from a transcendent design.

Marx, Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 · Marx and Engels, The Communist Manifesto

Lucretiusinferable

No god assigns life an end and nature was not made for us: meaning is therefore not inscribed in the order of things. But Lucretius does not conclude to a desperate absurd: once fear is removed, life finds its sufficiency in the stable pleasure that nature places within our reach, and the poem itself, devoted to enlightening men, bears witness to a meaning to be built here below. The absurdist share lies in the absence of cosmic finality, but the stress falls on a human meaning built by wisdom.

On the Nature of Things, V, 156-234 (the world not made for men) and III, 1-30 (the praise of Epicurus, liberator)

Michel de Montaigneinferable

Montaigne seeks the meaning of life neither in a cosmic order nor in an afterlife, but in the quality of a present existence well lived. Without denying a nature to follow, he makes of life a personal art, a day-by-day composition of the self rather than a received destiny. Meaning is not handed down from above, it is fashioned in the way one inhabits one's own life.

Essays, III, 13, "Of Experience"

Cynicisminferable

The Cynics measure life against nature as opposed to conventions, but refer it to no providence: meaning lies in the virtuous, free and self-sufficient life one forges through exercise (askēsis). More than discovering a given end, the point is to win an unconditioned way of existing, which tips meaning toward human work.

Diogenes Laertius, Lives, VI

Arguments and objections (2)
ArgumentNothing to discover, everything to makeSince nothing dictates in advance what a life should be, this absence is our freedom: meaning is not found but made, it arises from what one devotes oneself to, and makes us responsible for what we become. See the page
ObjectionAttacks the positionWill any meaning do?Making meaning a pure decision makes all projects equivalent, from the most trivial to the most odious; but we judge that a life has meaning only when devoted to something objectively worth it. Meaning is therefore not merely decided. See the page

Absurdism

2

No meaning to discover, and no substitute for it: the absurd arises from the clash between our thirst for meaning and the silence of the world, and no answer will come. Faced with the enigma, the point is to hold out without cheating: to live lucidly in revolt, without hope or resignation.

Explore this position →
Associated figures: Camus
Who stands here
Meursaultexplicit

Faced with every major choice, Meursault answers that at bottom it does not matter: to marry Marie or not, to take the Paris post or stay, one can say yes without anything really weighing in the balance. This is not a calculated indifference but a lived self-evidence: no life seems to him justified by a higher aim or by any , so that all are worth the same and no end comes to order them.

Part I, chapter 5: his answers to Marie about marriage and to his boss about Paris · Part II, chapter 5: his reaffirmed indifference to any higher aim

Camusexplicit

Two terms are equally certain for Camus: the human mind demands unity and meaning, and the world stays silent before that demand. lodges in neither term but in their divorce, in the confrontation itself: it is therefore neither a property of the world nor a defect in man, but a relation that cannot be dissolved without suppressing one of its terms. So meaning is neither given in advance nor purely absent: no transcendent meaning fills the divorce, yet the man who holds it without fleeing forges values in the present, hence a share of constructed meaning.

The Myth of Sisyphus (1942) · The Rebel (1951)

Arguments and objections (3)
ArgumentHolding out without cheatingThe absurd arises from the clash between our demand for meaning and the world's silence. Hope and renunciation are two escapes; the only lucid path is to hold both terms in revolt, without illusion or abdication. See the page
ObjectionAttacks the positionWhy revolt?Absurdism sets lucid revolt up as the right response; but if there is no meaning, nothing makes revolt preferable to indifference or renunciation. Either these values hold, and one leaves the absurd; or they do not, and revolt is as futile as what it defies. See the page
Argument Thought experimentSisyphus and his rockSisyphus rolls his rock forever, without hope or illusion; and yet, says Camus, 'one must imagine him happy': the worth of a life lies in the lucidity of the one who owns it, not in a meaning beyond it. See the page

Renunciation

1

Since no meaning is given and nothing truly replaces it, the torment comes from the demand itself. Faced with the enigma, the lucid response is renunciation: to detach the will, to stop asking of life what it does not contain, and to find in this withdrawal a peace without illusion.

Explore this position →
Associated figures: Schopenhauer
Who stands here
Schopenhauerexplicit

The world offers no end to realize: the is aimless and history accomplishes nothing. The only way out is soteriological: that the will, recognizing itself in the universal spectacle of suffering, turn against itself and deny itself, through the voluntary whose model the saints and mystics of every tradition provide. This final 'nothing' is not despair but deliverance, which Schopenhauer likens, in a personal and now contested reading of the Indian traditions, to the Buddhist .

The World as Will and Representation, §71

Arguments and objections (2)
ArgumentDrying up the source of tormentIt is insatiable willing that suffers, swinging endlessly between lack and boredom; peace is gained not by satisfying one more desire, but by quieting the will itself, by ceasing to ask of life what it does not contain. See the page
ObjectionAttacks the positionThe cure removes the patientRenunciation promises peace by extinguishing desire; but with no impulse, no more love, work, project, there remains only the absence of suffering, indistinguishable from the absence of life. The cure heals the patient by removing him. See the page
Youyou have not taken a stand on this axis yet.Locate yourself48 figures · 17 movements mapped
Problems

See the problem map in the Atlas →

  • Descriptive Thought experiment
    Sisyphus and his rock

    When our thirst for meaning meets the silence of the world, where can an answer lie: in an end that surpasses us, in the meaning we give ourselves, or in the lucid revolt of a life with no answer?

    an existence
Going further

Sub-problems to deepen this axis's discussion

  • Descriptive
    Is meaning inscribed in things?

    Does the world carry an order or design that precedes us, as the Stoics and providentialisms hold, or is it silent? Constructing one's meaning, revolting, or renouncing all share the same starting point: nothing is given.

    the order of things
  • Descriptive
    Meaning of life, or in life?

    Does life have an overall meaning, an answer to « why all this? », or only local meanings, the ones we find in a love, a work, a commitment, even if the whole has none?

    a life
  • Descriptive
    Must it last?

    If everything ends, through death and then the erasure of every trace, is what we do in vain, or can something have full meaning without lasting forever?

    the span of a life
  • Descriptive
    What if nothing meant anything?

    When the frameworks that gave meaning fall away, God, History, progress, does any meaning remain possible, or does the vertigo open in which nothing is worth anything?

    the frameworks of meaning
  • Descriptive
    Will any meaning do?

    Can a life be full of meaning if it is devoted to something trivial, or even bad, or does meaning require that the thing be objectively worth it?

    a life devoted to something

Related problems to broaden toward other axes

  • Descriptive
    Meaning without God?

    Does the meaning of existence presuppose a divine order that surpasses us, or can it hold entirely without God, on wholly human grounds?

    the order of the world
  • Descriptive
    Happiness or meaning

    Is a successful life necessarily happy, or can it be worthwhile through its meaning while being hard, demanding, at times unhappy?

    a life
  • PrescriptiveExistential
    Does beauty save?

    Is beauty a mere ornament, or what redeems an otherwise absurd or suffering existence and makes it bearable?

    existence as a wholeBeauty in life
  • Descriptive
    Everything ends: is it in vain?

    Since death erases everything, does what we do still have meaning, or can something be fully worthwhile without lasting forever?

    the course of a lifeDeath
  • PrescriptiveExistential
    Does meaning need God?

    Without God, does life lose all meaning, or can meaning be built entirely on a human scale?

    a lifeExistence of God
  • Descriptive Question
    Without God, is everything permitted?

    If no transcendent guarantor upholds our duties, do they keep their binding force, or do they become choices that can always be undone? Secularized societies put the phrase to the test every day.

    morality without a guarantorThe source of morality
  • PrescriptiveSacred
    A good beyond this world?

    Is the highest good attainable here below, or does it lie elsewhere: union with God, salvation, a beatitude that neither earthly pleasure nor virtue can give?

    a lifeThe highest good
  • PrescriptiveExistential
    Happiness and meaning

    Is a good life necessarily a happy one, or can it be full of meaning while being hard, demanding, sometimes unhappy?

    a lifeThe highest good

All problems →

Quotations
Our great and glorious masterpiece is to live fitly.
Michel de Montaigne · Essays, III, 13, "Of Experience"

See in the quotations

To all who are still filled with the will, what remains after its complete abolition is assuredly nothing. But conversely, to those in whom the will has turned and denied itself, it is this very real world of ours, with all its suns and galaxies, that is nothing.
Schopenhauer · The World as Will and Representation, §71

See in the quotations