← Back to the axis

Relation to others· Society and history

Progressivism

Axis: Tradition and transformationShould we preserve the legacy of our institutions, or transform society in the name of progress?

Societies can and must improve: reason allows us to identify inherited injustices and to correct them. Tradition carries no authority in itself; what matters is the emancipation and betterment of humanity.

Who holds this position

Movements 5

Marxismexplicit

If exploitation lies in the very structure of the relations of production, then reform can only manage it: only their overthrow abolishes it. Hence the revolutionary character of Marxist progressivism and its refusal of the alternatives: neither awaiting a moral evolution, nor the ideal cities of utopian socialism, nor mere philosophical critique will do, since to interpret the world leaves it intact. Thought itself has worth only as , a moment of real transformation borne by the class that has "nothing to lose but its chains." Philosophy ceases to be contemplation and becomes a weapon, as the eleventh thesis on Feuerbach sums up.

Marx, Theses on Feuerbach, XI (1845) · Marx and Engels, The Communist Manifesto (1848)

Transhumanismexplicit

Transhumanism carries the 's faith in progress to its limit: not only knowledge and institutions, but the human being itself can and must be improved. No tradition, no inherited order holds an authority that would withstand a demonstrable improvement; the past is merely a starting point that reason and technology are meant to surpass.

More, 'The Extropian Principles' · Condorcet, Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind (lineage)

The Enlightenmentexplicit

From the accumulation of knowledge and the spread of enlightenment the current draws a new thesis: humanity advances, and that march can be conscious and willed. Institutions and laws are not sacred merely for being old; they must prove their present usefulness, failing which reform is legitimate. pushes the idea to a law of history, the human mind progressing by stages toward truth, liberty and happiness. Against this creed will set the accumulated wisdom of tradition: this is the birth certificate of the divide between progressivism and conservatism.

Condorcet, Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind · Turgot, On the Successive Advances of the Human Mind

Pragmatismexplicit

Meliorism holds the world to be neither fatally good nor fatally bad, but improvable through intelligent effort: this drives Dewey's reformism, which invests education and democracy as levers of gradual, experimental progress. Society is not an order to be preserved but a project to be revised without end, through trial, error and correction.

Dewey, The Public and Its Problems (1927) · James, Pragmatism (1907), lecture VIII

Utilitarianismexplicit

Utilitarianism was born as a reformist program: subjected law, prisons and institutions to the test of utility, rejecting respect for tradition as such. extended this drive toward emancipation, notably of women. Institutions are worth only the well-being they produce, which licenses reforming them as soon as they fall short.

Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation · Mill, The Subjection of Women

Philosophers 7

Marxexplicit

Marx calls not for gradual reform but for a revolutionary overturning of the social order: the proletariat must overthrow the bourgeois state and abolish existing relations of production: a radical , hostile to any conservation of the established order.

Manifesto of the Communist Party, conclusion · Theses on Feuerbach, XI (changing the world)

Beauvoirexplicit

Beauvoir is resolutely emancipatory: The Second Sex is a call to transform the structures that make woman the Other, and her engagement (feminism, anticolonialism, support for liberation struggles) aims at abolishing inherited oppressions. The traditions that fix roles are, for her, alienation, not an order to be conserved.

The Second Sex (1949), perspective of liberation · Force of Circumstance (1963), political engagements

Benthamexplicit

Bentham judges institutions by their present utility alone, never by their antiquity: law must be methodically reformed, statutes codified, irrational survivals abolished. A radical reformer of the penal and carceral system (the Panopticon project), he denounces the nonsense of the common law and campaigns for a rational recasting of the codes. This is an avowed reformist progressivism.

A Fragment on Government (critique of Blackstone and the common law) · Panopticon, or the Inspection-House

Millexplicit

A committed reformer, Mill sees in the progress of humanity the horizon of morals and politics. He campaigns for the extension of the suffrage, popular education, social reform and, in The Subjection of Women, for the emancipation of women, which he also carries into Parliament. Freedom of thought matters precisely because it is the engine of human improvement.

The Subjection of Women (1869), ch. 1 (sexual equality as a demand of progress) · On Liberty, ch. 2 (freedom of opinion as a condition of progress)

Kantexplicit

Enlightenment is the human being's emergence from his self-incurred immaturity. Kant makes the free public use of reason the engine of a gradual progress of humanity, placing him clearly on the progressist side.

An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?

Show inferred positions (2)
Baconinferable

Against the prejudice that reveres Antiquity as the age of wisdom, Bacon reverses the argument: the Ancients were the youth of the world, and it is we, coming after so many accumulated centuries, who are the true elders. The authority of the received masters has therefore no value in itself; knowledge is not an inheritance to preserve but an open building site, indefinitely perfectible. This trust in the reforming power of reason holds first for the sciences; in politics, the great servant of the Crown remained cautious, which holds the score back from the extreme.

Novum Organum, I, §84 · The Advancement of Learning, I

Lockeinferable

By justifying the right of resistance and the revocability of government, Locke gives the Glorious Revolution its theory and breaks with the order of divine right. His confidence in the growth of knowledge through experience and in the reform of education places him on the reforming side, without revolutionary radicalism, hence a moderately progressive value.

Two Treatises of Government, II, ch. 19 (the dissolution of government)

Foundations and implications
↑ What grounds itProgressivism — Tradition and transformation!ProgressivismTradition and transformation
Prescriptive
Directional meaning — The meaning of history=Directional meaningThe meaning of history
Descriptive
A leaf — an application that grounds nothing further here.

What grounds it

The meaning of history

If history follows a march toward more reason and freedom, then inherited injustices are not a sacred order but stages to be surpassed. The directional meaning of history grounds progressivism: from Condorcet to Marx, to understand the movement of history is to give oneself the means to hasten it.

What it implies

A leaf — an application that grounds nothing further here.

Problems
  • PrescriptivePolitical & legal
    Is what lasts thereby good?

    Does an institution's endurance prove its worth, what has held having proven itself, or does "it has always been so" also shelter injustices that have lasted just as long?

    a tradition
  • Descriptive Thought experiment
    The wisdom of ages, or reason?

    Does the inherited order condense a knowledge no individual reason can match, calling for prudence, or can reason audit institutions and correct the injustice that has crept into them?

    the inherited order
  • PrescriptivePolitical & legal
    Reform or refound?

    Even when change is called for, should we reform step by step, at the risk of a slowness that lets injustice endure, or refound all at once, at the risk of undoing balances we never understood?

    social change
  • PrescriptivePolitical & legal
    The living, or the inheritance?

    Do the living have the right to rewrite what the dead built, "the earth belongs to the living", or are we the trustees of a legacy we must hand on to the generations to come?

    the generations