← See the axis · Freedom of the will

Freedom as the absence of constraint

To be free is to act from one's own reasons, not without a cause.

Supports Compatibilism

Hume · An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding · 1748

1. Compare the addict, driven by a craving he disowns, and the person who weighs her reasons and then acts accordingly: both have causes, but only the latter acts freely.
2. Freedom is therefore opposed not to the cause, but to constraint: free is the act that flows from my own will, even if that will is itself determined.
3. Thus freedom and determinism are reconciled: I am the author of my acts so long as they pass through my deliberation, with no need for a power to escape causes.

Therefore So one can be free and responsible in a determined world: this is the thesis of compatibilism.

How far does this reasoning convince you?