Work of fiction · myth

The Odyssey

What must we forget to live in peace without ceasing to be ourselves?

Version analyzed : The twenty-four books of the Homeric poem, book XXIV included. Its ancient and modern continuations (Dante, Joyce, the retellings) are left aside.

Twenty years after leaving for war, a man is still trying to get home. A goddess offers him freedom from age and death if he stays with her, and he spends his days weeping at the sea. Why prefer a distant house, a wife growing old and scores to settle to a life without end?

Spoiler-free by default: whatever gives the plot away stays hidden until you choose to show it.

The problem

The common belief put to the test

Going home, we assume, means finding our place again and being at peace there at last. We also assume that remembering is always good, and that forgetting is a loss or a cowardice.

The problem

We want to live in peace, and we want to remain the people our history has made us. The two desires work against each other. What would soothe Odysseus would cut him off from what he has lived and from those he loves. Regaining that life obliges him to claim what he is owed, and one debt called in brings on another. Forgetting would relieve us of a part of ourselves; forgetting nothing leaves us at war with those who wronged us. Neither way out comes free.

One can be rid of a pain by ceasing to care about its cause: the poem takes this solution seriously. Throughout the voyage, the most persistent threat is not dying but no longer wanting to . The lotus takes that wish from those who eat it, and whoever listens to the Sirens never sees wife or children again. Odysseus himself feasts for a year with the sorceress Circe, until his companions remind him of his country. Forgetting here is no failure of memory: it is a way of living, gentle and within reach. A man who no longer wishes to return no longer suffers from being away. If this way out is so close, we need to understand what could make anyone turn it down.

This way out has its extreme form: a life without end, offered on condition of giving up the return. , whose name can be heard in the verb "to hide", has held Odysseus for seven years and offers him freedom from age and death. The poem does not paint a happiness turned down: Odysseus weeps on the shore, and the nymph no longer pleases him. But his answer is what matters. He grants that is less beautiful and that she will die, and simply repeats that he wants to go home. He offers no argument, and one can see why: he is not comparing two lives, and the one on offer would not extend his own, it would replace it. would later argue that an would wear out the desires that make each of us who we are. Odysseus shows the other side of that idea: it is attachments already formed, to a mortal wife and an island, that make this particular immortality undesirable. Yet refusing to forget who one is presupposes that one can still be that person, and this is what the voyage denies him.

For holding on to oneself is not enough to survive, and survival sometimes demands giving oneself up. Trapped by the Cyclops, Odysseus gives his name as "Nobody", and the Greek plays on that word, on its variant mē tis, which also says "no one", and on , cunning intelligence. and see in it a milestone of : the subject saves itself by denying itself, and pays for its preservation with the very thing it meant to preserve. The poem, however, does not leave him at rest in this anonymity. Barely out of reach, Odysseus shouts his real name, and that name is what lets the Cyclops call down Poseidon's anger on him. Being safe, then, is not enough for him: he wants the deed to be his, even at the price of being within reach. But a name alone does not yet say who one is.

What fills that name is a story, and the poem makes us feel that we do not own it. Still anonymous among the Phaeacians, the people who took him in after his shipwreck, Odysseus himself asks the singer-poet, the bard, to sing of the Trojan Horse, and he weeps. The poem then compares him to a woman led into slavery after her husband has died before their city: the man who took the city weeps like those he took. To hear one's own story is to receive it from outside and to find in it what one had not seen. holds this scene to be paradigmatic for both history and poetry: what was mere occurrence becomes a story once it can be heard again. Odysseus then names himself and recounts his wanderings over four books, as a bard would, as though saying who one is came down to telling what one has lived: this is what would call . The poem adds two reservations. Elsewhere, the same man effortlessly invents whole lives, lies that resemble the truth: an identity made of narrative can be forged. And Circe, finding Odysseus and his companions broken by dwelling on their wanderings, shows that one can also get lost in one's past. If a story can lie, someone must be able to vouch for it.

No one, then, is oneself alone: others must be able to recognize us, and they cannot do so on our word. His own son says so from the start: no one knows by himself whose child he is. After twenty years, the absent man raises a very concrete question of identity, and the poem tries several answers. An old dog recognizes him. A nurse touches his scar, and the narrative stops at length to tell of the wound and of the name given by his grandfather, drawn from a verb of anger: Auerbach made this pause the model of Homeric style. It can also be read as a thesis: a mark on a body identifies someone only through the story it carries. , undoing at night what she has woven by day, holds time in suspense so that the question stays open. But what Odysseus finds on his return is not a place left intact.

Remembering what was then becomes remembering what is owed. In his absence, the suitors have consumed his goods and coveted his wife, and the poem announces early on that they will pay. Memory changes its nature: it was faithfulness, and it becomes bookkeeping. Penelope reproaches Antinous, one of the two ringleaders, with the ingratitude of a man whose father Odysseus saved. The man who acknowledges no debt and the man who forgets nothing he is owed can only collide. It remains to be seen whether a wrong can be settled by anything other than blood.

What do you do with a wrong that cannot be undone?
RepairPay back and move onRemember without claimingone's dueStrike without rememberingThe blood debtEurymachus (says)OdysseusTelemachusPenelopeAntinousEurymachusHalitherses Make them pay
Turn the pageTemporal orientationForget nothing

Hidden so as not to give anything away: Eupeithes, Zeus. They will be placed on the map once you show spoilers.Show spoilers to see how the characters change through the story.

  • Character, placed by their acts
  • Main character
  • Main antagonist
  • What they say / what they do

Click a character to see the scenes their position rests on.

Each figure is placed by what they do with the past and with what they are owed.

Spoiler passage
Spoiler passage

The poem does not leave the reader with the mere victory of one side. What it asks holds well beyond epic. What has been done to us is part of what we are: forgetting it would bring relief, and would take that part away. It is for you to say where you would draw the line.

And you?

0/4 answered

Answer these questions: your point appears on the map, among the characters. Your answers add to your profile, which stays on your device; only each answer on its own is counted anonymously, to show how readers split.

A treatment painlessly erases all your memories of someone close who has died, the happy ones and the painful ones alike.

What do you do?

You are offered a life free of old age and illness, far from home, on condition that you never see anyone from your former life again.

What is your answer?

While you were away, someone ruined your family. Caught, he offers to give everything back, and more.

How do you respond?

A civil war is ending. So that the country can hold together, it is proposed to ban all prosecution of those who committed murder during the conflict.

Should we give up punishing so that the peace can hold?

Answer on both axes to appear on the map.

The characters

  • Main character

    Odysseus

    King of Ithaca, gone for twenty years

    What they embody

    Being oneself means taking back one's place and yielding nothing of what one is owed.

    Key action

    He comes home disguised as a beggar, to test those who have stayed loyal to him.

    Main positions

  • Telemachus

    Odysseus's son, who never knew him

    What they embody

    A son also inherits his father's accounts.

    Key action

    He summons the assembly of Ithaca to denounce those emptying his house.

    Main positions

  • Penelope

    Odysseus's wife, besieged by suitors

    What they embody

    Waiting is a way of acting: as long as nothing is concluded, nothing is lost.

    Key action

    At night she unravels the web she weaves by day, to delay her remarriage.

    Main positions

  • Main antagonist

    Antinous

    One of the two ringleaders of the suitors

    What they embody

    What can be taken is ours, and whatever threatens our hold must be removed.

    Key action

    He hurls a stool at a beggar who has come to ask for food in the house he occupies.

    Main positions

  • Eurymachus

    The other ringleader of the suitors

    What they embody

    Everything can be paid back, provided one knows when to negotiate.

    Key action

    He swears to Penelope that he will protect Telemachus while plotting his death.

    Main positions

  • Spoiler passage
  • Halitherses

    An old seer of Ithaca

    What they embody

    Misfortune comes from those who let things happen; it need not be prolonged.

    Key action

    He publicly warns the suitors of what awaits them.

    Main positions

  • Spoiler passage

How the work answers, in its own way

The poem chooses neither forgetting nor memory: it makes us feel what each one costs. It holds attachment to one's own story to be what makes a man someone, and shows that this attachment is anything but peaceful.

With the plot's turns

Where the narrative leans, axis by axis

Distinct from what the characters think: where the narrative seems to lean, judging by what it confirms or refutes, what it stages and what it values. This is an inferred, debatable reading, not its authors' opinion. On each axis, the diamond ◆ marks where the narrative appears to lean.

  • Inferred reading on “The meaning of punishment” (reveals plot turns)
  • Inferred reading on “Temporal orientation” (reveals plot turns)
  • inferable
    15
    75
    10

    The narrative seems to lean toward: Eudaimonism

    The narrative seems to measure a life by what it accomplishes and whom it binds together, rather than by its length or pleasantness: the whole poem is built on straining toward a home, and presents ceasing to desire it as a loss. Limit: Odysseus gives no reason for refusing immortality, and concedes everything Calypso puts forward. The poem therefore does not refute the offer: it only shows someone who does not want it.

    Odyssey, V, 215-224 (the refusal of Calypso)

    Formal devicesWhat the story confirms or refutes
  • Inferred reading on “Forgiveness” (reveals plot turns)

What it leaves open

The poem stages no mutual forgiveness. The ending itself is disputed: according to the scholia, Aristophanes of Byzantium and Aristarchus placed the end of the Odyssey at XXIII, 296, and what they meant remains debated. Our reading of forgetting depends on what comes after that line.

Other problems in the work

Questions the work raises in passing, over an episode or a subplot: they do not carry the whole work, but they are worth a pause.

  • Book XII, the Sirens

    Can one bind oneself in advance against what one will want tomorrow?

    Odysseus has himself tied to the mast so as to hear the song without yielding. He treats his future self as an opponent whose weaknesses must be anticipated. made this scene the model of rationality through precommitment: one protects oneself from oneself by giving up one's options.

    Relation to desire

  • Book I, Zeus's speech

    Who is responsible for our misfortunes?

    Zeus complains that humans blame the gods when it is their own folly that makes their lot worse. The poem thus opens on a thesis of responsibility, in a world of set fates and constantly meddling gods. We then have to understand how one can be guilty in a world where the gods also lead minds astray.

    Moral responsibility

  • Books IX and XIV, the Cyclops and the swineherd

    What do we owe the stranger who knocks at the door?

    is the touchstone of the whole poem: the Cyclops devours his guests, the swineherd Eumaeus shares what little he has with an unknown beggar. This duty depends neither on the stranger's merit nor on what he might bring, and it is owed to anyone, in a world otherwise wholly organized around one's own.

    Partiality

  • Book XI, in the underworld

    Is glory worth life?

    The hero of the , who had chosen a brief and glorious life, says he would rather be a serf on earth than king among the dead. Yet he strides off joyful on learning that his son has distinguished himself. Glory does not console the dead man for his own death, but what is passed on after him still matters to him.

    Living on in one's works

The concepts at play

The homecoming that drives the poem: less a journey here than a taking back of oneself, and one that has a cost.
The cunning intelligence that saves Odysseus by making him "Nobody": what preserves him goes through erasing what it preserves.
The sacred bond of hospitality: its violation, more than the theft, is what makes the suitors guilty in the poem's eyes.
Horkheimer and Adorno's reading: Odysseus's cunning foreshadows a reason that preserves itself by giving up what it meant to save.
Saying who one is by telling one's life: Odysseus does so, and the same Odysseus makes up false lives that are just as credible.

Going further

On Philoscopia

The question the work raises, and what philosophy brings to it: the problems, thought experiments, arguments and thinkers that shed light on it.

The question

What must we forget to live in peace without ceasing to be ourselves?

The philosophical problems at stake

Thought experiments

Close thinkers

  • PhilosopherAdornoWith Horkheimer, makes Odysseus a figure of reason saving itself through self-denial.
  • PhilosopherHorkheimerCoauthor with Adorno of the reading of Odysseus as a figure of reason preserving itself through self-renunciation.
  • PhilosopherPaul RicœurNarrative identity on one side, the commanded forgetting of amnesty on the other: the two terms of the problem.
  • PhilosopherArendtHolds Odysseus's listening among the Phaeacians to be paradigmatic for history and poetry.
  • PhilosopherEmmanuel LevinasSets against Odysseus, who always returns to himself, Abraham, who leaves for the other with no return.
  • PhilosopherBernard WilliamsWhether an endless life is desirable depends on the desires that bind us to our own.

Readings

  • Horkheimer, , Excursus I, "Odysseus or Myth and Enlightenment" : The most radical reading of Odysseus's cunning as self-renunciation.
  • Hannah Arendt, , "The Concept of History: Ancient and Modern" : What it means to weep on hearing one's own story.
  • Paul Ricœur, Memory, History, Forgetting, Part three, the chapter on forgetting (commanded forgetting: amnesty) : To tell apart the forgetting that relieves, imposed forgetting, and forgiveness, which the poem does not know.
  • Erich Auerbach, Mimesis, Chapter 1, "Odysseus' Scar" : What the long pause over the scar reveals about Homer's way of telling a story.
  • Barbara Cassin, Nostalgia: When Are We Ever at Home? : Odysseus, Aeneas, Arendt: what it means to be at home.

Other works

  • The Penelopiad (Margaret Atwood) (novel, 2005) contests : Retells the story from the point of view of Penelope and her maidservants: what the poem did not hear.
  • Ulysses (James Joyce) (novel, 1922) extends : The homecoming brought down to a single ordinary day, with a hero who takes no revenge.
  • The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time extends : It too asks what remains of a hero who returns to a life that went on without him.