← Back to the axis

Relation to oneself· Existence

Memory and transmission

Axis: Temporal orientationToward which dimension of time should we orient our life: the present, the future, or the past?

We are heirs: what we have received from the past constitutes us and calls to be passed on. Cultivating memory, honoring our debts and leaving something to future generations give life its depth.

Who holds this position

Movements 1

Confucianismexplicit

Confucianism orients existence toward transmission: the past of the sage-kings is the model to study, recover, and hand down, and the veneration of ancestors anchors the present in the continuity of the generations. To learn is to revisit the old so as to draw the new from it: memory is the mainspring of moral and political life.

Confucius, Analects (Lunyu), 2.11 · Confucius, Analects (Lunyu), 1.9

Philosophers 2

Confuciusexplicit

Confucian time is oriented toward the past as a model: reviving the old to understand the new is the master's way. Studying the Ancients, the rituals and the odes transmits a wisdom to embody; the future counts less as a project to invent than as a continuity to preserve. This is an orientation of .

Analects, II, 11 (reviving the old to know the new) · Analects, VII, 19 (a man fond of antiquity, untiring in his study)

Show inferred positions (1)
Machiavelliinferable

The remedy for the present is sought in the past: one must imitate the ancients and keep drawing the body politic back toward its beginnings. This orientation toward memory and the Roman example coexists with a keen sense of the present occasion, which must be seized without delay.

Discourses on Livy, Book I Preface; III.1 · The Prince, ch. XIV (reading histories)

Arguments and objections
ArgumentWe are heirsWe receive a language, a world, goods we did not create; honoring them and passing them on inscribes our brief life within a time longer than our own.
  1. Before projecting or savoring anything, we have already received everything: a language, a body of knowledge, tools, a habitable world that others built and handed down to us without our having earned it.
  2. To measure one's life by its pleasures or its successes alone is to cut oneself off from this depth. For as for , the community is a , a pact between the dead, the living and those not yet born. To honor one's debts to the past, through or simple gratitude, is to acknowledge what one owes.
  3. And to pass on in turn, a knowledge, a memory, a livable world, is to give one's brief life a share in a vaster time. What passes through us exceeds us: this frees us from the obsession with « optimizing » hours we thought were ours alone.

Therefore So to live time well is to know oneself a passage: to receive with gratitude, to transmit with care, and to find there a depth that neither the instant nor the project gives.

See the page
ObjectionA borrowed lifeTurned toward what one has received and what one must hand on, one carries debts one never contracted, and leaves it to others, or to later, to live for oneself.
  1. To orient oneself toward the past and transmission is to make one's life a link in a chain: receiving an inheritance, honoring what one owes, passing it on in turn.
  2. But this link, by dint of serving the chain, ends up no longer belonging to itself. One lives under the gaze of the dead and in care for those not yet born, between a loyalty to the past and a duty to the future, without ever inhabiting the present, which truly is one's own.
  3. Under the fine name of depth a weight may hide: debts one did not choose, roles one perpetuates without willing them. To define oneself by what one has received is sometimes to spare oneself the task of becoming oneself: lacking , one lives out of loyalty a life that is not one's own.

Therefore So the orientation toward memory can dispossess us of the only time that is ours: by honoring too much what comes before and after, one forgets to live the in-between, which is our life.

See the page
ObjectionYou will not be thereInheritance and posterity soften the fear of vanishing; but it is our own finitude we evade by dreaming ourselves survived in others.
  1. Grant that we receive everything from the past. It remains to ask what it is worth, for the life one has to live, to turn first toward what precedes and follows us.
  2. For of transmission I will not see the fruit: when my legacy bears, I will no longer be there. To devote myself to it is to live for a time from which I am absent, and to entrust my worth to what will happen without me.
  3. One may see in it a last ruse against death: failing to endure, one dreams of surviving in one's children, one's work, one's line. But to face one's own end, , is to understand that no one dies in my place, and that this time allotted to me is mine to live, not my heirs'.

Therefore So to devote oneself to transmission can soften the thought of vanishing, but at the cost of a detour: one busies oneself with the afterward so as not to have to inhabit the now, the only time still ours.

See the page
Foundations and implications
↑ What grounds itMemory and transmission — Temporal orientation!Memory andtransmissionTemporal orientation
Prescriptive
Organic community — The origin of the social bond=Organic communityThe origin of the socialbond
Descriptive
Holism — Individual and society=HolismIndividual and society
Descriptive
A leaf — an application that grounds nothing further here.

What grounds it

The origin of the social bond

If the community is a living inheritance that precedes and constitutes me, then living well means receiving that legacy and passing it on in turn. The organic conception of the social bond grounds the orientation toward memory and transmission: from Burke to Confucius, honouring our debts to the past and bequeathing to future generations gives life its depth.

What it implies

A leaf — an application that grounds nothing further here.

Practices
Honoring what you inheritHabitAttested · Confucius

To know yourself a link: receiving from those before, passing on to those who follow.

For Confucius, and the remembrance of ancestors are the root of the virtues: knowing oneself a link between those who came before and those who will follow. This twofold attention, receiving and transmitting, gives time a depth that neither the instant nor the project affords. Today it is a counterweight to a life measured by productivity alone.

Unlock the practices

The step-by-step routine is part of Premium access: a modest contribution that supports and encourages the development of Philoscopia. Everything encyclopedic stays free and open source — this only opens the actionable practices.

Discover Premium access

Already unlocked on another device? Sign in to restore it.

Problems
  • PrescriptiveExistential Thought experiment
    Would you live it again?

    A demon offers you to relive your life, identical, endlessly: would you want it? The test reveals whether you truly inhabit your time, rather than hanging it on tomorrow or mourning it as yesterday.

    the time of a life
  • PrescriptiveExistential
    The weight of heritage

    We are heirs: does fidelity to roots, to debts, to the dead make the depth of a life, or a chain that shuts the living inside a past that is over? For too much memory, too, can paralyze.

    what we have received
  • PrescriptiveExistential
    For whom to build after oneself?

    To plant a tree whose shade you will never sit under: do we owe anything to those who will come, who have done nothing for us? Transmission turns the present toward a future that outlasts us.

    those who will come