← Back to the axis

Relation to truth· Belief and knowledge

Transforming oneself

Axis: The point of philosophyWhat is philosophy for?

Philosophy is an exercise before it is a discourse: a way of life that works on our desires, fears, and judgments so as to transform the one who practices it. "Empty is the word of the philosopher that heals no human suffering": its worth is that of medicine for the soul and an art of living, not of a system.

Who holds this position

Movements 1

Stoicismexplicit

Stoic philosophy is an exercise (askêsis) more than a body of knowledge: a daily discipline of judgment, desire, and action, whose raw material is the very life of the one who practices it. Physics and logic keep their place, but in the service of the art of living: to know the order of the world is to learn to consent to it.

Epictetus, Discourses, I.15 · Seneca, Letters to Lucilius, 16

Philosophers 1

Epicurusexplicit

Philosophy is medicine for the soul: its word is empty if it heals no suffering. Young or old, it is never too early nor too late to philosophize, that is, to work at the health of the soul; even the study of nature has no other end than to dispel the fears, of the gods and of death, that trouble our life.

Letter to Menoeceus, 122 · Principal Doctrines, XI

Arguments and objections
ArgumentPhilosophy as a way of lifeFor the Ancients, to philosophize was a way of life made of exercises working on desires and fears, not a body of doctrines. What troubles us lies in our ill-ordered passions, not in a lack of theories; a doctrine that does not change the one who holds it stays a dead letter.
  1. For the Ancients, philosophy was not a body of doctrines to learn but a way of life: meditation, self-examination, preparation for hardship, so many exercises that worked on desires, fears, judgments.
  2. For what troubles us is not so much ignorance of theories as our ill-ordered passions and opinions: knowing that death is nothing is of no use if one goes on fearing it; one must train oneself to live it.
  3. A doctrine that does not change the one who holds it stays a dead letter: the true measure of a philosophy is the transformation it works, the passage from a troubled life to a freer and more lucid one.

Therefore So philosophy is worth something as medicine for the soul and an art of living: not a discourse added to one's life, but an exercise that remakes it.

See the page
ObjectionAttacks the positionTo heal oneself, or to seek the truth?Philosophy-as-exercise is judged by its benefit; but what consoles is not necessarily true, and an illusion soothes better than a bitter truth. Turning toward one's own salvation may moreover turn away from the world and from others.
  1. Philosophy-as-exercise is judged by its effect on the one who practices it: it is worth something if it soothes, heals, helps one live better.
  2. But what consoles is not necessarily what is true: a comforting illusion 'heals' better than a bitter truth. To measure philosophy by its benefit is to risk preferring what soothes to what is.
  3. And turning toward one's own salvation may turn one away from the world: while one works on one's serenity, injustice remains. The art of living risks being merely a retreat, a care of self that abandons truth and others.

Therefore So philosophy cannot be reduced to a therapy: the search for truth may disquiet rather than soothe, and to think is not first of all to heal oneself.

See the page
ObjectionAttacks the positionSelf-help does it betterThe project of living better has been parceled out among proven psychotherapies, more uncertain coaching, and an uneven bookshop shelf; the most rigorous of these paths, cognitive therapy, openly claims Epictetus and has turned the idea that our troubles are born of our judgments into a protocol one can evaluate. For many precise difficulties, these heirs would look more practicable than the original: the care of the self would have changed hands.
  1. The ambition to live better has changed address, and it has spread across very unequal standards: proven psychotherapies for diagnosed disorders, largely unregulated coaching for performance, self-help of variable quality for the everyday run of life. They are not all worth the same, but each opens a door the schools of wisdom no longer open.
  2. The most rigorous is cognitive-behavioral therapy, and its case is striking: already wrote men are disturbed not by things, but by the judgments they pass on things, and its founders, Albert Ellis and then Aaron Beck, claimed him explicitly. The idea, once isolated and equipped, let itself be turned into a protocol one evaluates, compares and teaches: what ancient wisdom offered to a few, this lineage has made testable.
  3. Philosophy has its exercises and even its handbooks, but they commit you to an entire reorientation of existence, backed by texts that demand time and background. Whoever seeks targeted relief will find shorter routes: graduated methods, fitted to a precise difficulty, anxiety, grief, confidence, attention, and whose effect can at least be measured.

Therefore So, for whoever wants above all to feel better on a precise point, the medicine of the soul has found more convenient, and sometimes better-tested, practitioners: keeping the word 'wisdom' then looks like nostalgia, and seeking what works seems to lead out of philosophy.

See the page
Problems
  • PrescriptiveExistential
    What is the point?

    Is philosophy's uselessness its very dignity, the one free knowledge pursued for nothing beyond itself, or a real defect next to the sciences and to action, like Thales falling into a well while watching the stars, to the laughter of the Thracian servant girl?

    the activity of philosophizing
  • PrescriptiveExistential
    Discourse or a way of life

    Is philosophy a body of doctrines, or first of all a way of life made of exercises that transform the one who practices them, since reduced to mere theory?

    philosophy itself
  • Descriptive
    Does philosophy make progress?

    After centuries, philosophy has no settled results like the sciences and the same questions keep returning: a failure to dissolve pseudo-problems, or the mark of questions not meant to be settled once and for all?

    the discipline itself