← Back to the axis

Relation to others· Bonds

Agape as gift

Axis: Nature of loveWhat lies at the heart of love: a lack, a gift, or something else?

True love does not seek to fill a lack: it gives itself without condition or calculation. It is directed at the other person for their own sake, regardless of their qualities or what they can offer us.

Who holds this position

Philosophers 1

Thomas Aquinasexplicit

The supreme love is for Thomas charity (caritas), the Latin rendering of : a love of benevolence that wills the other's good and descends from God toward the creature rather than rising from lack toward the good, as Platonic does. But Thomas gives it a precise and decisive definition: charity is a (amicitia) of the human being with God, 's very category taken up and transposed: founded on the sharing of beatitude, it supposes, like every friendship, mutual benevolence and a communion. The gift remains primary, since it is God who loves first and makes this friendship possible by grace, yet it takes the reciprocal form of philia, not that of a one-way gift; the old upward thrust of desire toward the good nonetheless persists as a residual share.

Summa Theologiae, IIa-IIae, q. 23 (charity as friendship)

Foundations and implications
↑ What grounds itAgape as gift — Nature of love=Agape as giftNature of love
Descriptive
Theism — Existence of God=TheismExistence of God
Descriptive
A leaf — an application that grounds nothing further here.

What grounds it

Existence of God

If God exists and defines himself as love, then the highest love is a free gift, in his image: it gives itself expecting nothing in return. Theism grounds agape: Christianity sets against the eros that desires and lacks the charity that is directed at the other for their own sake.

What it implies

A leaf — an application that grounds nothing further here.