← See the axis · The meaning of life
ArgumentNothing to discover, everything to make
No meaning is inscribed in things in advance: it is for each of us to create our own, through our choices and commitments.
Supports
Sartre · Existentialism Is a Humanism · 1946
- No meaning is inscribed in things in advance: the world is there, with no instructions; we exist first, with no essence or end given to us.
- But this absence is not a lack: it is our freedom. Since nothing dictates what my life should be, it is for me to decide, through my choices and commitments.
- Meaning is therefore not found but made: it arises from what I devote myself to, and this commitment makes me fully responsible for what I become, with no received order to unload it onto.
Therefore So there is nothing to discover and everything to make: the meaning of a life is what each creates through their projects, not an order they undergo.
How far does this reasoning convince you?
Not at all
Entirely
Put to the test
Problem