See the axis · The meaning of life

Argument

Nothing to discover, everything to make

No meaning is inscribed in things in advance: it is for each of us to create our own, through our choices and commitments.

Supports

Sartre · Existentialism Is a Humanism · 1946

  1. No meaning is inscribed in things in advance: the world is there, with no instructions; we exist first, with no essence or end given to us.
  2. But this absence is not a lack: it is our freedom. Since nothing dictates what my life should be, it is for me to decide, through my choices and commitments.
  3. Meaning is therefore not found but made: it arises from what I devote myself to, and this commitment makes me fully responsible for what I become, with no received order to unload it onto.

Therefore So there is nothing to discover and everything to make: the meaning of a life is what each creates through their projects, not an order they undergo.

How far does this reasoning convince you?

Not at all
Entirely