Philosophers

Siddhārtha Gautama

A diagnosis, not a pessimism: arises from and the illusion of a self, and there is a path to extinguish it.

Indian · 563 BCE – 483 BCE

The Awakened One, founder of , a wandering teacher of north-eastern India whose life tradition places between 563 and 483 BCE, dates that are traditional and debated. Born a prince of the Shakya clan, he is shown by tradition leaving his palace at the sight of sickness, old age and death, then living six years as a renunciant and ascetic before reaching awakening under the Bodhi tree at Bodh Gaya. He first preaches at Benares, gathers around him a community of monks and laypeople, the community (saṅgha), and teaches for forty years. His words, at first transmitted orally, were fixed centuries later in the discourses (suttas) of the Pāli Canon. His teaching begins from an observation, the pervasiveness of dis-ease in existence, and seeks less to explain the world than to release one from it: to the great metaphysical questions that do not aid that release Gautama opposes a deliberate silence, just as a man struck by an arrow need not learn who shot it before it is drawn out. Spread from Sri Lanka across East Asia, his teaching gave rise to one of the great philosophical and spiritual traditions of the world.

19 / 80 axescoverage 24%
See the 6 quotations

WikipediaWikidata

Relation to truthRelation to oneselfRelation to othersRelation to the worldEmpiricism — Source of knowledgeSkepticism — Relation to certaintyThe primacy of truth — The value of truthVirtue / moral perfectionism — The highest goodHard determinism — Freedom of the willBundle theory — Nature of the self (Structuring position)Extinction and detachment — Relation to desire (Structuring position)Abolitionism — The meaning of suffering (Structuring position)Recollection — Attention and diversionAsceticism — Bodily pleasures (Structuring position)Teleology and providence — The meaning of lifeThe examined life — InteriorityWhat is up to us — Scope of actionPreparing for the passage — DeathExistentialism — Essence and existenceVirtue ethics — Criterion of right actionImpartialism — PartialityPathocentrism — Moral circleThe primacy of reason — Status of emotionsEmpiricismThe primacy of truthBundle theoryExtinction and detachmentImpartialismPathocentrismThe primacy of reason19OF 80 AXES24% covered
radius ∝ commitment◎ structuring position○ rim = uncovered
The essentialsthe positions at the core of this system of thought
  1. There is no self: what we call "self" is only an impermanent bundle of aggregates, and to seek a permanent within is to chase an illusion.

    Bundle theory90%Nature of the selfsee the position →
  2. Suffering has a single, removable cause, : it is grasping desire that binds us, and extinguishing it, not satisfying it, is the way to release.

    Extinction and detachment95%Relation to desiresee the position →
  3. holds no meaning to be exalted: it is a dis-ease to diagnose like an illness and to cure completely, here and now.

    Abolitionism93%The meaning of sufferingsee the position →
  4. Neither indulgence of the senses nor mortification of the body leads to awakening: only the , between the two extremes, gets there.

    Asceticism65%Bodily pleasuressee the position →
Relation to truthWhat can be known3/3 positioned
Major
−0.6
Truth that empowers
Justification

At the root of suffering lies not a fault but a mistake: ignorance (), which takes the impermanent for lasting and the selfless for a self. The path is a therapeutics of seeing, beholding things as they are; the teaching itself is only a raft, a means to be left behind once the far shore is reached.

Majjhima Nikāya (the raft parable)

2 more
inferable
−0.4
Criticism
Justification

Liberating knowledge is established neither by scriptural authority nor by rational speculation, but by examination and direct experience: the Buddha invites one to test for oneself, come and see, and decisive knowledge arises from a perception refined by meditation. The source is therefore experiential, though this experience includes contemplative insight and not the five senses alone.

Kalama Sutta (Anguttara Nikaya) · Satipatthana Sutta (the foundations of mindfulness)

inferable
+0.2
Fallibilism
Justification

Gautama urges not to believe on the strength of authority, tradition, or reasoning alone, but to test for oneself what leads to good and to peace: this is the famous counsel to the Kālāmas. This wariness toward dogmatic speculation and fixed "views", joined to the refusal to settle idle questions, marks a moderate critical reserve, without lapsing into thoroughgoing skepticism, since the path itself is held to be verifiable.

Kālāma Sutta, Aṅguttara Nikāya 3.65 (do not believe on authority alone) · Cūḷamālukya Sutta, Majjhima Nikāya 63 (the parable of the arrow, the undeclared questions)

Relation to oneselfWho I am, how to live12/12 positioned
Major
0
10
0
90
Justification

The argument proceeds by exhaustive review: Gautama runs through the five aggregates that make up a person (form, feeling, perception, formations, consciousness) and shows that none meets the criteria for a self. Each is , hence a source of dis-ease, and above all eludes our command, "let it be thus and not otherwise"; yet what can neither last nor be mastered cannot be held as "my self". With no fifth term surviving behind these aggregates, there is no self-substance, only a bundle of conditioned processes: this is , which squarely rejects the of the Upaniṣads, the permanent Self identified with that the Brahmanical tradition held to be our true identity.

Form is not-self, feeling is not-self, perception is not-self, formations are not-self, consciousness is not-self.Anattalakkhaṇa Sutta (Saṃyutta Nikāya 22.59)

Anattalakkhaṇa Sutta, Saṃyutta Nikāya 22.59 (the discourse on the not-self characteristic) · Dhammapada, XX, 279 (all phenomena are not-self)

Major
0
5
95
Justification

If all suffering is conditioned, it has a locatable cause, and to remove the cause is to remove the effect: this is the logic of applied to dis-ease. Gautama then traces the chain back and names as that link, the grasping thirst that clings to pleasures, to existence, or even to non-existence and sets the wheel of rebirth turning again. The move is original: he neither moralizes desire as a vice nor celebrates it as fullness, but coolly identifies it as the cause to be extinguished, which puts detachment at the centre of the path and guarantees, against any fatalism, that release is possible.

This is the noble truth of the origin of suffering: it is this craving which leads to renewed existence.Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta (Saṃyutta Nikāya 56.11)

Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta, Saṃyutta Nikāya 56.11 (the sermon at Benares) · Dhammapada, ch. XXIV (Craving)

Major
+0.8
Stoic indifference
Justification

The follow a physician's procedure: state the malady (, the unsatisfactoriness that pervades even pleasures, because they are impermanent), isolate its cause, affirm that one can be cured of it, prescribe the treatment. The whole weight of the argument rests on the third truth: if the cause is conditioned, its cessation is genuinely attainable, here and now. Suffering therefore has no redemptive value, it is neither a punishment to expiate nor a trial to be exalted, but a pathological state to be abolished, which sharply separates Gautama from the wisdoms that sacralize ordeal or resign themselves to dis-ease.

Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta, Saṃyutta Nikāya 56.11 (the sermon at Benares) · Dhammapada, ch. XX (The Path)

Major
−0.9
Justification

(sati, continuous present attention) is one limb of the (the ) and the heart of practice. The Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta teaches gathering attention upon the body, feelings, mind, and phenomena, against mental scattering. Gautama's teaching is thus a discipline of recollection par excellence.

Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta, Majjhima Nikāya 10 (the discourse on the foundations of mindfulness) · Dhammapada, ch. II (Heedfulness)

Major
−0.3
Temperance
Justification

The criterion is not moral but pragmatic: what counts is what actually leads to awakening. Gautama had tested both failures in his own flesh, the pleasure-life of the palace and the six years of extreme fasting that had left him wasted without awakening him; from this he concludes that both extremes miss their aim. The first sermon accordingly rejects both the pursuit of sensual pleasures, "low and vulgar", and self-mortification, "painful and fruitless", for the alone. Without condemning the body, he treats sensory pleasures as attachments that feed : the leaning stays ascetic, but regulated and deliberately measured, against the grain of the radical asceticism of the renunciants of his time.

These two extremes, monks, should not be followed by one who has gone forth: the pursuit of sensual pleasure, and the pursuit of self-mortification.Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta (Saṃyutta Nikāya 56.11)

Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta, Saṃyutta Nikāya 56.11 (the two extremes and the Middle Way)

10
25
65
Justification

The Buddha's highest good is nirvana, the extinction of craving and the cessation of suffering, presented as the highest peace and bliss, yet beyond the pleasure of the senses as much as beyond pain. It is won through the path, which unites wisdom, ethical discipline (sila) and meditation: a liberating perfection, not a happiness of enjoyment.

Dhammapada, XV and XXIII · Sermon at Benares (the four noble truths)

6 more
inferableMajor
85
10
5
0
Justification

Existence has an assignable end and a directed meaning: to be freed from suffering and the cycle of rebirths so as to reach (the going-out of greed, hatred, and delusion). The whole path is ordered toward this goal, giving the teaching a teleological structure, even though the end is set not by a creator but discovered as the nature of things.

Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta, Saṃyutta Nikāya 56.11 (the sermon at Benares) · Dhammapada, ch. XXVI (The Brahmin)

inferable
+0.2
Compatibilism
Justification

Nothing springs from an uncaused will: every phenomenon is dependently arisen (paticca-samuppada), and the self that believes itself a free author is itself an aggregate without substance. Yet the Buddha teaches no fatalism, which he reproaches in Makkhali Gosala: intention (cetana) is the act itself, karmically decisive, and it can be transformed through training. The path therefore requires real effort, between the determinism of conditioning and the illusion of free will.

Samyutta Nikaya, XII (dependent origination) · Anguttara Nikaya (refutation of fatalism)

inferable
−0.7
Justification

The transformation aimed at proceeds first through inner examination: observing one's own mental states, , and perceptions in meditation and introspection. The good life turns on work upon the mind more than on outward action, even though ethical conduct (sīla) is its indispensable support.

All that we are is the result of what we have thought: it is founded on our thoughts, it is made up of our thoughts.Dhammapada, I, 1

Dhammapada, ch. I (The Pairs), 1-2 · Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta, Majjhima Nikāya 10 (the foundations of mindfulness)

inferable
−0.6
Knowing the difference
Justification

A decisive part of suffering springs from our claim to master what eludes us: one cannot command the aggregates "let them be thus and not otherwise", and trying to hold the impermanent only feeds . Wisdom consists in loosening that grip and working the one domain genuinely open to effort, one's own mind, which brings Gautama close to an economy of control centered on inwardness.

Anattalakkhaṇa Sutta, Saṃyutta Nikāya 22.59 (one cannot command the aggregates) · Dhammapada, ch. III (The Mind)

inferable
30
30
40
0
Justification

For the Buddha, death is neither the annihilation of a self (there is no permanent self, ) nor the survival of a soul, but a passage within the cycle of rebirths governed by karma: a mere stage, yet one to be carefully prepared, since the dying person's state of mind orients the rebirth, and something continues without any soul remaining. A balanced position, until the liberation that alone halts the cycle.

Suttas on karma and rebirth · Bardo Thödol (Tibetan tradition)

inferable
+0.5
Justification

and deny any fixed, substantial essence of beings: nothing has a stable nature of its own, all is conditioned process, arisen from causes and bound to dissolve. There is no substance-soul to be discovered beforehand, only a becoming to be understood, which sets Gautama clearly apart from essentialism without thereby making him a modern existentialist.

Anattalakkhaṇa Sutta, Saṃyutta Nikāya 22.59 (the aggregates are impermanent and not-self) · Dhammapada, XX, 277-279 (all is impermanent, not-self)

Relation to othersWhat we owe each other3/3 positioned
5
85
7
3
Justification

Non-harming (ahiṃsā) and the first precept, to abstain from harming the living, extend moral consideration to all sentient beings capable of suffering, not to humans alone. All fear the rod, all hold life dear: compassion expressly takes in the whole of living beings caught in the cycle of rebirth, which places the teaching on the pathocentric side.

All tremble at the rod, all fear death. Putting oneself in the place of others, let none kill nor cause to kill.Dhammapada, X, 129

Dhammapada, ch. X (Violence), 129-130 · Karaṇīya Mettā Sutta, Sutta Nipāta 1.8 (may all beings be happy)

2 more
inferable
15
0
45
40
Justification

Buddhist ethics cultivates right conduct (sila) and wholesome states of mind: generosity, loving-kindness (metta) and compassion (karuna) toward all beings. It is an ethics of virtue and care, where the agent's inner transformation matters, joined to an attention to the karmic fruits of acts, intention bearing the moral weight of the action.

Metta Sutta · Dhammapada

inferable
−0.7
Concentric circles
Justification

Loving-kindness (mettā) is cultivated toward all beings without distinction: the practice taught consists in extending loving-kindness beyond loved ones, to the indifferent and then to the enemy, as a mother protects her only child. Extended to all that lives, this benevolence tilts the teaching toward a benevolent impartialism.

As a mother would protect her only child at the risk of her own life, so let one cultivate a boundless heart toward all beings.Karaṇīya Mettā Sutta (Sutta Nipāta 1.8)

Karaṇīya Mettā Sutta, Sutta Nipāta 1.8 (the discourse on loving-kindness) · Dhammapada, ch. I (The Pairs)

Relation to the worldWhat there is1/2 positioned
2 more
inferableMajor
−0.5
Educating the emotions
Justification

The ultimate root of suffering and afflictive emotions is ignorance (avidyā), the misapprehension of the impermanent, selfless nature of reality. The three poisons, greed, hatred, and delusion, dissolve through right view and penetrating understanding: it is by knowledge that affect is transformed, which gives the teaching an intellectualist leaning, tempered by the central role of meditative practice and the cultivation of the heart (mettā).

Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta, Saṃyutta Nikāya 56.11 (ignorance and right view) · Dhammapada, ch. XX (The Path)

it depends (contextualist)

Gautama's teaching acknowledges no creator God, and release depends on no divine grace but on one's own effort and understanding; deities (devas) appear, but they too are caught in the cycle of rebirth. Yet the early discourses show Gautama declining to settle the great metaphysical questions (is the world eternal? infinite?) as "not conducing to release": one must therefore distinguish his avowed non-theism, which rules out a creator, from the noble silence (avyākata) on the ultimate, which is neither theism nor militant atheism.

Practicesliving the belief — what to do
Right speechRuleAttested · Buddhism

Say only what is true, useful and kind, at the right time; otherwise, stay silent.

Right speech (sammā vācā) is one of the eight limbs of the taught by : to say only what is true, useful, kind, and spoken at the right time. A statement exact but useless and hurtful, the Buddha refrained from uttering. This exercise trains you to weigh not only the truth of what you say, but its usefulness and its timing, and to prefer silence to a frankness that would only harm. Today it helps you speak with care in delicate moments, without betraying the truth.

Unlock the practices

The step-by-step routine is part of Premium access: a modest contribution that supports and encourages the development of Philoscopia. Everything encyclopedic stays free and open source — this only opens the actionable practices.

Discover Premium access

Already unlocked on another device? Sign in to restore it.