← Back to the axis

Relation to the world· Philosophy of religion

Fideism

Axis: Faith and reasonHow do faith and reason relate to each other: agreement, conflict, or indifference?

Faith eludes reason: God is encountered through the heart, through commitment or a leap, not through demonstration. Trying to prove faith misunderstands its nature, which begins where calculation ends.

Who holds this position

Philosophers 3

Michel de Montaigneexplicit

The mainspring of the is a paradoxical : by ruining reason's claim to prove anything of God, Montaigne does not destroy faith but strips it of its false supports. A reason incapable of reaching the slightest certainty cannot ground religion, which can therefore hold only by grace and authority, not by demonstration. Far from setting faith and reason in a conflict, he separates them while ranking them, the very weakness of reason serving as an argument for believing submission.

Essays, II, 12, "Apology for Raymond Sebond"

Show inferred positions (2)
Wittgensteininferable

Religious belief is not a hypothesis rivalling science: believer and unbeliever are "on an entirely different plane". It is a picture that regulates a whole life, an unconditional commitment, not a conclusion drawn from proofs. Hence a position at once fideist (faith as commitment, not demonstration) and of separate domains (a plane other than the factual). "Wittgensteinian fideism" is, moreover, a label coined by his critics, not by him.

Lectures on Religious Belief (1938); Culture and Value

Rousseauinferable

The vicar's faith rests neither on the authority of the Church nor on a demonstration, but on inner feeling: it is the heart that attests to God where reason wavers. This religion of conscience, midway between fideism and a harmony of faith with natural reason, heralds the religious feeling of the Romantics and of .

Rousseau, Emile, Profession of Faith of the Savoyard Vicar

Foundations and implications
This is a root foundation — nothing grounds it further.Fideism — Faith and reason=FideismFaith and reason
Descriptive
Non-evidentialism — Ethics of belief!Non-evidentialismEthics of belief
Prescriptive
↓ What it implies

What grounds it

This is a root foundation — nothing grounds it further.

What it implies

Ethics of belief

If faith is a leap that begins where proof ends, then to believe is a matter of decision, not a constraint of the evidence. Fideism grounds doxastic voluntarism: Pascal's wager invites us to bet on God for want of demonstration, making belief an act of the will.