Relation to oneself· Adversity
Prometheanism
Axis: Scope of action — Facing the world, should we focus on what is up to us or strive to extend our mastery?
The limits of our power are not fixed once and for all: through knowledge, technology, and collective action, humanity can transform the world and push back what seemed out of reach. Rather than accepting the order of things, we should work to change it.
Philosophers 1
Machiavelliexplicit
Against the fatalism that leaves everything to chance or to God, Machiavelli reserves half the game for man: rules one part of our actions but leaves us to govern the other. is that active part: to raise, while the weather is calm, dikes against the river that will overflow, to seize the occasion, to fit one's manner to the quality of the times. He leans toward boldness, for fortune yields to the daring.
The Prince, ch. XXV · The Prince, ch. VI (the occasion)
Argument
- History is strewn with conquered « inevitabilities »: plague, famine, infant mortality, distances thought impassable. Each time, what was filed under the immutable order of things turned out to be a problem to be solved.
- This retreat is nothing magical: it comes from knowledge, which grasps causes, and from action, often collective, which takes hold of them. assigned to science the task of making us « as masters and possessors of nature »; added that men make their own history, through their .
- Before an ordeal, to presume the limit can be crossed is therefore no naivety, it is to draw the lesson of what has already happened. Whoever yields too soon denies himself victories that others, less resigned, knew how to win.
Therefore So refusing to treat the given as final is no pride, it is the condition of all progress: we change only what we first refused to endure.
See the pageObjection
- Grant that knowledge has undone many an inevitability. But these victories are the species', and most often statistical: medicine pushes back mortality, it does not abolish your death.
- Yet the ordeal, you, you live it in the singular: this grief, this illness, this time that will not return. No collective progress gives back the one who is lost, nor will it give you back the age you were. Before this, the ambition to transform stands empty-handed.
- The Promethean then risks forever deferring peace: as long as a limit remains to be pushed back, he grants himself no rest, and one always remains. By measuring his serenity against his mastery, he condemns himself never to be at peace just where he can do nothing.
Therefore So even an endless progress leaves intact a share of the irreducible, the one where each of us, alone, must come to terms with what he will not change.
See the pageObjection
- The Promethean project measures wisdom by what one manages to change. But there is always more to change: each limit pushed back uncovers another, and the effort never knows rest.
- Above all, the real has the last word. Illness, grief, aging, death end up foiling the best-laid plans; and the nature we thought we had tamed sometimes reminds, harshly, those who force it, like those antibiotics whose overuse has bred bacteria they no longer cure.
- Whoever has placed all his peace in the power to transform finds himself without recourse the day he runs up against the untransformable. Overreach, what the Greeks called hubris, called down a punishment in their tragedies: not out of superstition, but because it forgets the measure of things.
Therefore So the ambition to master everything, for want of acknowledging a share of the irreducible, prepares its own defeats and the bitterness that follows them.
See the pageFrom private trouble to common causeExerciseInspired by Marx
For , what we endure as a personal fate is often a shared condition, and a shared condition can be changed together through , collective action, where one person alone is powerless. This exercise starts from a difficulty you face on your own and asks whether others face it too, and what a first common step might be. Today it counters the isolation that turns a common problem into a personal verdict.
- Take a difficulty you experience as yours alone: at work, in your neighborhood, in your daily conditions.
- Ask the displacing question: am I the only one, or is this the shared situation of people in my position?
- Find at least one other person in the same case, and talk: compare what each of you took for an individual failing.
- Name the common cause behind the private troubles: the rule, the arrangement, the silence that affects you all.
- Decide together one small, concrete step within reach: a shared request, a pooled resource, a meeting, a first collective move.
- Take that step with others, and judge by what changes for the group, not for you alone.
Not every hardship is collective, and turning an intimate grief into a cause can be a way of fleeing it. This exercise fits shared conditions, not private mourning; and acting together means listening to the group, not enlisting it behind your own conclusion.
Imitating the prudentRuleInspired by Aristotle
What would the prudent person do here? Imitate their discernment until it becomes your own.
For , telling things apart is taught by no rule: perceives what is right in the singular case, and you first learn it by watching those who have it. Right action, he says, is what « the prudent person » would decide. This rule gives you a living compass rather than a recipe: when no method settles the matter, take your bearings from the discernment of those you admire, until in time you come to judge as they do.
Unlock the practices
The step-by-step routine is part of Premium access: a modest contribution that supports and encourages the development of Philoscopia. Everything encyclopedic stays free and open source — this only opens the actionable practices.
Discover Premium accessAlready unlocked on another device? Sign in to restore it.
Sorting the possible from the inevitableRuleInspired by the Serenity Prayer (Reinhold Niebuhr)
The serenity to accept what cannot be changed, the courage to change what can be, and the wisdom to tell the difference.
A famous prayer, by the Protestant theologian Reinhold Niebuhr, asks for « the serenity to accept what cannot be changed, the courage to change what can be, and the wisdom to tell the difference ». Independently of its original religious setting, what we keep here is its structure of discernment, the of the ancients made method: faced with an ordeal, not to settle too quickly between accepting everything and wanting to change everything, but to look for the boundary, case by case. Today this rule helps when a difficulty seems to swamp everything and you no longer know where to act or where to let go.
Unlock the practices
The step-by-step routine is part of Premium access: a modest contribution that supports and encourages the development of Philoscopia. Everything encyclopedic stays free and open source — this only opens the actionable practices.
Discover Premium accessAlready unlocked on another device? Sign in to restore it.
Turning a fatality into a problemExerciseInspired by Descartes
held that a problem, however daunting, becomes solvable once you divide it into parts and proceed in order, from the simplest to the most complex: the method by which he hoped to make us « masters and possessors of nature ». This exercise applies it to something you have resigned yourself to as a plain fact: it treats the limit not as a fate, but as a problem with a first step. Today it counters the discouragement that freezes us before what seems immovable.
Unlock the practices
The step-by-step routine is part of Premium access: a modest contribution that supports and encourages the development of Philoscopia. Everything encyclopedic stays free and open source — this only opens the actionable practices.
Discover Premium accessAlready unlocked on another device? Sign in to restore it.
- PrescriptiveMoral SituationAccept, or resign oneself?
Where is the line between serenity before the inevitable and passivity, even a convenient excuse, before a wrong that effort could put right?
a wrong suffered - DescriptiveMy power, or our power?
What is not up to me alone, illness, injustice, the course of the world, may be up to us together: by seeking power in the inner self alone, does the dichotomy ignore the collective action that shifts the limits of the possible?
collective power