ExerciseInspired by Karl Popper
Looking for what would prove you wrong
For , an idea counts as knowledge only if you can say what, if observed, would refute it: a belief that nothing could ever contradict is not solid, only sheltered. This exercise turns that test on your own convictions: actively looking for what would prove them wrong, so as to hold them as revisable conjectures rather than dogmas. Today it guards against stubbornness and the information bubbles where one meets only what confirms one's view.
Unlock the practices
The step-by-step routine is part of Premium access: a modest contribution that supports and encourages the development of Philoscopia. Everything encyclopedic stays free and open source — this only opens the actionable practices.
Discover Premium accessAlready unlocked on another device? Sign in to restore it.
Enacts
- Ethics of belief · Evidentialism