← Back to the axis

Relation to others· Society and history

Social construction

Axis: Social identityAre categories like gender, race or class natural, constructed, or objective social realities?

These categories are not natural givens but contingent products of history, culture and power relations, instituted by norms and discourses that make them pass for natural. What has been constructed can be deconstructed: one is not born, but rather becomes, a woman.

Who holds this position

Movements 1

Existentialismexplicit

Applied to social identities, the thesis of existence without essence denies that they are natural givens: it is who draws the decisive formula, « one is not born, but rather becomes, a woman », making gender a historically constructed situation and not a nature. The Jew, for , likewise has no essence: it is the gaze of others that fixes them, and to take up that identity as an assumed project, rather than suffer or flee it, belongs to freedom, not to essence.

Sartre, Anti-Semite and Jew; Beauvoir, The Second Sex

Philosophers 3

Beauvoirexplicit

If no biological, psychic or economic destiny settles in advance what a woman is, then femininity cannot be an essence: it is the outcome of an elaboration civilization imposes on the human female. Beauvoir here pries apart sex, a bodily given, and the becoming-woman shaped by upbringing, law and the gaze of others, grounding the distinction the theories of gender would take up. The consequence is political: what was built in history can be undone there, against any naturalism that would justify the hierarchy of the sexes by nature.

The Second Sex (1949), vol. II, opening

Sartreexplicit

Existence precedes essence: no nature fixes in advance what one is. The Jew, Sartre shows, is in part made by the situation and the antisemite's gaze. Social identities are constructed, not given.

Anti-Semite and Jew; Existentialism Is a Humanism

Show inferred positions (1)
Michel de Montaigneinferable

What we take for our identity, our tastes, our beliefs, our moral judgments, is very largely the deposit of the of the place and time we were born into: "we have no other test of truth than the example and pattern of the opinions and usages of our own country". Education and the fold of habit make us what we are, to the point where we mistake for a law of nature what is merely local usage. This lucidity about the social manufacture of our certainties places him on the side of construction, without his making it a systematic theory.

Essays, I, 23, "Of Custom" and II, 12

Foundations and implications
↑ What grounds itSocial construction — Social identity=Social constructionSocial identity
Descriptive
Culturalism — Nature and culture=CulturalismNature and culture
Descriptive
Constructivism — Status of knowledge=ConstructivismStatus of knowledge
Descriptive
+
↓ What it implies

What grounds it

Nature and culture

If what we take for human nature varies from one society to another, then the categories that classify us, gender first of all, are products of history and not natural givens. Culturalism grounds social construction: Beauvoir sums it up: "one is not born, but rather becomes, a woman".

What it implies

Status of knowledge

If the categories through which we think are contingent products of history and power relations, knowledge itself does not escape that grip. Social constructionism grounds constructivism about knowledge: Foucault shows that each era determines, through its discourses and institutions, what may there be held to be true.