← Back to the axis

Relation to oneself· Identity and freedom

Essentialism

Axis: Essence and existenceDo we have a nature that precedes us, or do we become what we choose to be?

Every being has an essence that precedes and defines its existence: there is a human nature, with its own ends. Living well means fulfilling what this nature calls for, as the seed fulfills the plant.

Who holds this position

Movements 11

Platonismexplicit

The priority of essence follows from the separation of the Forms: if the Form exists in itself, outside time and outside things, then the «what it is» precedes by right any singular existence, which merely imitates it. A thing is what it is only by participation (methexis, the relation by which the sensible derives its being from the intelligible) in a model it neither grounds nor alters. Essence is thus neither abstracted from cases by the mind nor posterior to individuals: it is prior and causal. This is essentialism at its source, whose order existentialism will later reverse.

Plato, Republic, books VI-VII · Plato, Phaedo, 100b-102a

Aristotelianismexplicit

Knowledge aims at the universal and the stable: there are indeed essences, that by which a thing is what it is, distinct from its accidental features. But to lodge those essences in a separate world, like 's Ideas, needlessly doubles reality and explains neither how the Idea makes the thing be nor where it resides. Aristotle therefore brings the back into the individual substance: it exists only as in this horse, this man. Essentialism is thus preserved without a dualism of worlds, which grounds knowledge of the sensible rather than turning away from it.

Aristotle, Metaphysics, Z (book VII) · Thomas Aquinas, On Being and Essence

Stoicismexplicit

Stoicism assigns the human being a determinate nature, reason, a fragment of the logos that orders the cosmos; the very telos is formulated as living in agreement with nature. The good life is not self-invention but the fulfillment of this rational essence, common to all human beings.

Diogenes Laertius, Lives, VII · Cicero, On Ends, III

Show inferred positions (8)
Vedānta (Advaita)inferable

One's identity is not to be constructed through one's choices: it is a given, eternal essence, the , which precedes all existence and all action. The spiritual path creates nothing, it unveils what already is: to become oneself is to recognize the timeless essence that avidyā (ignorance) had concealed. This is a radical essentialism.

Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad, IV · Śaṅkara, Commentary on the Brahma-Sūtras (Brahma-Sūtra-Bhāṣya)

Rationalisminferable

Deduction needs premises: to demonstrate a thing's properties one must start from a definition of its essence, and that essence must be graspable by the understanding alone, without recourse to experience. Hence the school's essentialism: things have intelligible, definable essences that reason reaches a priori. thus deduces all the properties of substance from its definition alone, and grasps the essence of matter as pure extension, through the analysis of the piece of wax rather than through the senses. This is the exact reverse of , for which no essence precedes the observation of particular cases.

Spinoza, Ethics, I, definitions and first propositions · Descartes, Principles of Philosophy, part I

Cynicisminferable

Cynicism measures life against nature (physis) as opposed to convention (nomos): there is a natural human condition, self-sufficient and shameless like that of the animals, which civilization has covered over and which must be recovered. Nature is the norm, not an identity to be invented.

Diogenes Laertius, Lives, VI

Epicureanisminferable

Epicureanism grounds ethics on a given nature: every living being, from birth, seeks pleasure and shuns pain, and it is this natural constitution that reveals the human end. To live well is to follow nature rightly understood, not to redefine oneself freely.

Epicurus, Letter to Menoeceus · Lucretius, On the Nature of Things

Taoisminferable

Taoism holds that each being has its spontaneous nature (ziran), received from the Tao, and flourishes by following it rather than by fashioning itself. The sage returns to the uncarved block (pu), original simplicity, against the distortions of artifice and convention: to preserve a given nature, not to create one.

Laozi, Tao Te Ching, ch. 28 and 19 · Zhuangzi

The Enlightenmentinferable

The project of a science of man presupposes a universal and stable human nature: beneath the diversity of customs, everywhere the same faculties, the same passions, the same reason. It is this underlying identity that makes possible rights valid for all and a morality that is not the mere reflection of local custom. Yet the essentialism remains moderate: human nature is one, but its faculties are latent and develop through education, so that man is less a fixed essence than a capacity to form himself.

Hume, Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, sect. VIII · Diderot, article "Homme" in the Encyclopédie

Utilitarianisminferable

Utilitarianism takes as given a hedonic human nature, governed by pleasure and pain, the universal bedrock of the calculus of utilities. This common psychology grounds the moral science, even if Mill grafts onto it the demand for individuality and self-development, which tempers Bentham's essentialism.

Bentham, Principles of Morals and Legislation, I · Mill, Utilitarianism

Confucianisminferable

Confucianism assumes a common human nature, held to be good in its orthodoxy (Mencius' four sprouts), but one that is fulfilled only through long self-cultivation, study and the rites. A moderate essentialism, then: a given essence, whose realization nonetheless depends entirely on formation.

Mencius, II A and VI A · Analects, XVII.2

Philosophers 21

Platoexplicit

Plato is one of the major sources of essentialism: each sensible thing is what it is only by participating in an intelligible, eternal and immutable Form that constitutes its true essence. The , especially in the and the , makes essence a separate being, prior and superior to individual existence.

Phaedo, 74a-75d · Republic, V, 476a-480a

Thomas Aquinasexplicit

Thomas takes up Aristotelian , every sensible being being a compound of matter and form, but adds a decisive distinction: in every creature, the essence (what the thing is) is really distinct from the (the act of existing). An essence does not possess existence of itself, it receives it; in God alone is the essence to exist, he being subsistent being itself. The nature of things is therefore genuinely real and defined, yet radically dependent, hanging on the act of being that God communicates to it. An essentialism, but reordered by the primacy of existence as act.

On Being and Essence (De ente et essentia), 4-5 · Summa Theologiae, Ia, q. 3, a. 4

Plotinusexplicit

's receive in Plotinus a proper home: they are the thoughts of the , which contemplates them eternally in a unity where thinking and being coincide. The essence of each thing is thus its intelligible Form, prior and superior to its sensible existence, which is only a reflection of it. Platonic essentialism is therefore preserved and even reinforced, the intelligible becoming the living content of a divine mind.

Enneads, V, 5 (That the Intelligibles Are Not Outside the Intellect) · Enneads, V, 9

Spinozaexplicit

For Spinoza, the actual essence of a thing is nothing but its conatus, the striving by which it perseveres in its being: everything, the human being included, acts and exists by following the necessity of its nature. Far from indeterminate, each being involves an eternal essence deduced from substance; what it can do, what it becomes, follows from what it is.

Ethics, III, props. 6-7 · Ethics, II, def. 2

Aristotleexplicit

Aristotle turns 's own demand for essence against him: if the essence of a thing is what makes it what it is, lodging it in a separate world of makes it unable to explain the sensible thing, from which it is then cut off. The form must therefore be in the individual, as the soul is in the body: every sensible substance is a compound of matter and form, . Essence is no longer a celestial model but the what-it-was-to-be, what the thing is in itself, grasped in the definition, without thereby denying that form is the most real and most knowable thing in it.

Metaphysics, VII (Zeta).4 and 17

Husserlexplicit

Against the empiricism that sees in essences only names or habits of mind, Husserl holds that we have an intuition of essences themselves (Wesensschau): starting from an example, even an imagined one, free variation brings out the invariant without which the thing would no longer be what it is, its necessary structure. Red, number, a melody, the act of judging each have an ideal essence I can grasp with evidence, independently of any fact. Phenomenology is thus an eidetic science, of the general and the necessary, not a record of the merely existent; the of his heirs will remain foreign to him.

Ideas I, §1-4 · Logical Investigations, II

Schopenhauerexplicit

Operari sequitur esse: acting follows being, each acts only in accordance with what he already is, and existence merely unrolls an essence given in advance. It is the exact opposite of existential freedom: one does not make oneself, one discovers oneself determined, and the only freedom is the metaphysical one of the intelligible character.

On the Freedom of the Will, ch. III

Show inferred positions (14)
Leibnizinferable

The complete notion of each individual substance contains a priori all its past, present and future predicates: to be Caesar is to possess from all eternity the essence from which everything he will do follows. The individual is thus wholly determined by his intelligible essence, conceived by God before creation, a radical essentialism.

Discourse on Metaphysics, §8-13 (the complete notion, the case of Caesar)

Descartesinferable

Each substance has a principal attribute that constitutes its essence: thought for the mind, extension for the body. This determination of a fixed nature, prior and defining, amounts to a pronounced essentialism, the self's very existence being known through its essence as a thinking thing.

Principles of Philosophy, I, art. 53 · Meditations on First Philosophy, II and VI

Laoziinferable

Each being has its own nature, its , which wisdom consists in letting unfold rather than thwarting. To live well is not to invent oneself freely but to recover the (pu), the unhewn simplicity one had before culture sculpted it. The ideal is not self-creation but a return to a given nature.

Dao De Jing, ch. 28 and 19 · Dao De Jing, ch. 32 and 37

Śaṅkarainferable

There is in each a determinate, eternal essence, the self (), which does not make itself by its choices but is from all eternity what it is, identical to . Empirical existence, with its history and acts, adds nothing to this nature: it only veils it. This is a strong essentialism, the exact opposite of the idea that existence would precede essence, since the task is not to create oneself but to recognize what one has always been.

Upadeśasāhasrī · Commentary on the Bhagavad Gītā, II

Socratesinferable

The Socratic procedure lies entirely in the question what is it?: what is courage, piety, justice? To ask for the definition is to presuppose a single, stable essence behind the diversity of particular cases, one that inquiry must bring out. Knowing this common nature matters more than listing examples.

Plato, Euthyphro · Plato, Laches and Meno

Epictetusinferable

For Epictetus, the human being has a determinate nature, reason, a fragment of the divine logos, which sets him apart from the animal and assigns his proper function. To live well is not to invent oneself but to fulfill this nature: to act as a rational being, in accordance with what we are by constitution.

Discourses, I, 6 and II, 9 · Enchiridion

Marcus Aureliusinferable

Each thing has its own nature and end: man's is to live according to , and all morality consists in fulfilling that received essence. This Stoic sets a definition of man before his existence, against any idea of a freedom that would create itself without a model.

Meditations, V, 1 · Meditations, VIII, 12 · Meditations, X, 2

Senecainferable

Seneca shares the Stoic essentialism: the human being possesses a rational nature, a spark of the logos, and wisdom consists in bringing it to completion. Nature has placed the seeds of virtue in everyone; to develop them, not to create oneself from nothing, is the task of existence.

Letters to Lucilius, 76 and 120

Epicurusinferable

Epicurus reads the human end in nature itself: from the cradle, before any reasoning, the animal seeks pleasure and shuns pain. This given natural constitution defines the sovereign good and the successful life, an essentialism of natural ends set within a materialist frame.

Letter to Menoeceus · Cicero, On Ends, I

Kantinferable

Kant grants the human being a rational nature that is not chosen: it is humanity as an end in itself, the source of dignity and the ground of the moral law. This rational essence is given and universal; but moral character is won through freedom, which tempers the essentialism without abolishing it.

Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, II · Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View

Zhuangziinferable

Each being has a "way of being so of itself," the that is to be let unfold: the sea bird dies if treated like a man, and one cripples the duck by trying to lengthen its legs. To live well is therefore not to create oneself freely but to espouse one's own native cast. Yet this nature is no fixed essence defined once and for all: it is fluid, open to metamorphoses, which holds Zhuangzi back from a clear-cut essentialism and places him more moderately on the side of the given against self-invention.

Zhuangzi, ch. 18 (the sea bird) · Zhuangzi, ch. 8 (the duck's legs)

Benthaminferable

The whole of Bentham's science rests on a constant human nature: the human being is governed by pleasure and pain, everywhere and always. This given hedonic psychology is the fixed bedrock from which morals and legislation are calculated, rather than a nature to be invented or transformed.

Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, I

Diogenes of Sinopeinferable

Diogenes presupposes a natural human condition, made of simple needs and shameless like that of the animals, which civilization has covered over and which must be recovered: nature is a norm to be uncovered, not an identity to be invented. But this nature remains for him a negative criterion, what subsists once artifice is removed, without the metaphysics of a fixed essence; hence a moderate naturalist position rather than an emphatic essentialism.

Diogenes Laertius, Lives, VI, 70-71

Confuciusinferable

Confucius says little of human nature, save that by nature men are close, by practice they grow apart. The common ground is thin, and it is self-cultivation, study and the rites that make the gentleman: what is essential plays out in formation more than in a given essence, hence a position near the center, barely inclined toward the given.

Analects (Lunyu), XVII.2 and V.13

Foundations and implications
↑ What grounds itEssentialism — Essence and existence=EssentialismEssence and existence
Descriptive
Finalism — Explaining nature=FinalismExplaining nature
Descriptive
Realism about universals — Universals=Realism aboutuniversalsUniversals
Descriptive
Eudaimonism — The highest good!EudaimonismThe highest good
Prescriptive
Virtue ethics — Criterion of right action!Virtue ethicsCriterion of right action
Prescriptive
Fulfillment — Meaning of work!FulfillmentMeaning of work
Prescriptive
↓ What it implies

What grounds it

Explaining nature

If each being tends toward an end of its own, it is because a form, an essence, defines it and guides its development. Finalism grounds essentialism: in Aristotle, the final cause and the form coincide, and the nature of a thing is what it is meant to become.

Universals

If general properties really exist and are not mere names, then things have a nature, a form that defines them in their own right. Realism about universals grounds essentialism: whether the Forms subsist apart (Plato) or within things themselves (Aristotle), the essence of a being is a reality that knowledge discovers.

What it implies

The highest good

If the human being has a proper nature, a function that defines it, then a life is good when it fully accomplishes that function. Essentialism grounds eudaimonism: Aristotle draws the highest good from man's proper function, the excellent exercise of reason, of which pleasure is only the accompaniment.

Criterion of right action

If the human being has a nature and a function of its own, acting well means excelling in the fulfilment of that function, that is, being virtuous. Essentialism grounds virtue ethics: Aristotle defines the human good by the excellent activity of reason, a matter of character more than of rules.

Meaning of work

If the human being has a nature made of faculties to be actualized, then work, through which one objectifies one's capacities and transforms the world, fulfills as much as it tires. Essentialism grounds work as fulfillment: for Hegel, it is by shaping the world that the human being forms themselves and wins the recognition of others.

Practices
Eidetic variation: finding the essentialExerciseAttested · Husserl

To grasp what is essential to something, a friendship, a promise, justice, varied it freely in imagination and watched which changes destroyed the thing and which left it intact. The features you can drop without losing it are accidental; the one whose removal collapses the thing is the invariant, the you were after. Today it is a sharp tool for thinking: it cuts through vague definitions and shows what a concept cannot do without.

Unlock the practices

The step-by-step routine is part of Premium access: a modest contribution that supports and encourages the development of Philoscopia. Everything encyclopedic stays free and open source — this only opens the actionable practices.

Discover Premium access

Already unlocked on another device? Sign in to restore it.

Problems
  • Descriptive Thought experiment
    "It's my nature": truth or excuse?

    To appeal to one's nature, "that's how I am, I can't change," is it an honest acknowledgment of what one is, or an excuse to flee what one remains answerable for?

    a person appealing to their nature
  • Descriptive
    Finding oneself, or inventing oneself?

    The injunction "be yourself" is itself divided: is self-realization bringing to light a self already there, or freely inventing one? "Become who you are" tries to hold both at once.

    self-realization
  • Descriptive
    A nature that binds?

    Supposing we have a nature, does it tell us how to live? Does knowing what we are settle what we ought to become, or is there a leap from the one to the other?

    a human nature
  • Descriptive
    Where does the essence of things come from?

    If things have an essence, where do they get it: from a plan that conceives them before they exist, from nature itself, from a convention of our minds, or from nothing?

    the essence of things