See the axis · Relation to desire

Objection

The leaky jar

To affirm all your desires is to condemn yourself to never being satisfied.

Objects to

Plato, Schopenhauer

  1. Affirming desire assumes that, by following it, one can reach a kind of fullness: we want, we obtain, we enjoy.
  2. But a satisfied desire does not die out, it shifts: no sooner is the wanted thing reached than a new lack arises, and the pleasure of having gives way to the desire for something else. compared the insatiable soul to a leaky jar, filled without ever being full.
  3. Whoever says yes to all their desires is therefore not the master of their life, but the servant of the next lack: they run, and what they pursue draws back by just as much.

Therefore So unreserved affirmation does not lead to the promised fullness, but to a restlessness that never closes.

Deepenings
The pendulum of lack and boredom
  1. Schopenhauer saw the life of willing as a pendulum: as long as a desire is unmet, we suffer from the lack; once it is met, boredom creeps in, and we must desire anew to escape it.
  2. Pleasure, on this view, is never more than a brief respite between two pains, never a state in which one could rest.
Possible resolutions of the objection

Your choice is recorded in your profile, like a questionnaire answer.