Movements

Renaissance humanism

Returning to ancient texts to learn how to live again, and preferring the wisdom that forms a person to learning devoted to disputation.

c. 1341 – c. 1592

PetrarchPico della MirandolaErasmus

A movement born in fourteenth-century Italy around , which made the (grammar, rhetoric, history, poetry, moral philosophy) the basis of a new culture. The humanists sought out ancient texts, edited and translated them: their method was the return to the sources, ad fontes. They often criticized , the philosophy of the medieval universities, mocking its Latin and its subtleties, though some combined it with their reading, like . In Florence, the of the chancellors, from to , made the study of the ancients a school for political life; another, more contemplative current, that of , blended into it, and the two met in the same circles. In the North, made it a , a piety grounded in the Gospel reread in its sources rather than in the theology of the schools. reworked its legacy in a sceptical vein. The movement's unity lies in shared practices of reading and interpreting texts more than in a doctrine: Pico exalts where Montaigne deflates human presumption. The dates used (1341, Petrarch's coronation; 1592, Montaigne's death) are landmarks.

3 / 80 axescoverage 4%
See the 10 quotations
Relation to truthRelation to oneselfFree willTransforming oneselfMemory and transmission3OF 80 AXES4% covered
radius ∝ commitment○ rim = uncovered
Relation to truthWhat can be known1/1 positioned
Major
10
15
75
0
Justification

Philosophy is worth what it makes of the person who practises it. asserts this against the dialecticians: it is better to will the good than to know the truth. and carry on this primacy of moral philosophy over speculation. The civic humanists of Florence, from Salutati to Bruni, also defend the active life in the service of the city: to form the citizen through letters is to serve the republic, which gives a smaller share to transforming the world.

Petrarch, On His Own Ignorance and That of Many Others (1367) · Bruni, Dialogues to Pier Paolo Vergerio (c. 1401-1406) · Montaigne, Essays, I, 26

Relation to oneselfWho I am, how to live2/2 positioned
2 more
inferableMajor
0
15
85
Justification

For the humanists, the future is built through memory. judges his age barbarous and seeks living interlocutors in and , to whom he addresses letters. To restore the exact text of the ancients, following the ad fontes method, is to restore a way of living.

Petrarch, Letters on Familiar Matters, XXIV.3-4 (letters to Cicero and Seneca) · Erasmus, Antibarbari (1520)

inferable
−0.6
Compatibilism
Justification

has God speak to Adam: the human being has no fixed place and gives itself the form it chooses, within a created order. defends against a that cooperates with grace, which remains indispensable to salvation, and Luther answers him with the bondage of the will (1524-1525). The position holds for Pico and Erasmus; stands back from this exaltation.

Pico della Mirandola, Oration on the Dignity of Man (1486) · Erasmus, On Free Will (1524)

Relation to othersWhat we owe each other0/0 positioned
— no positions recorded
Relation to the worldWhat there is0/0 positioned
— no positions recorded

↑ Influences received

  • ReinterpretsNeoplatonismIn Florence, Ficino translated Plato and then Plotinus (1492) and drew from them a Platonic theology of the soul; Pico della Mirandola took from them the idea of a concord of all wisdoms.Read
  • Reacts againstScholasticismThe humanists blamed scholasticism for its barbarous Latin and for subtleties that make no one better.Read