← Back to the axis

Relation to the world· Aesthetics

Creation

Axis: Nature of art — Does art imitate reality, or does it create something radically new?

Art does not copy the world: it brings forth forms, visions, and worlds that did not exist before it. The artist's genius lies in the power of invention, not in faithfulness to reality.

Who holds this position

Movements 1

Romanticismexplicit

Art ceases to imitate nature in order to create it: the work springs from , that original power which does not receive its rules from without but gives them to itself. Against classical and the canons inherited from the age of Enlightenment, Romanticism makes a creative faculty and the artist a kind of second creator. Originality becomes the supreme value, and the work the expression of a unique inwardness.

Coleridge, Biographia Literaria · Novalis, Fragments

Philosophers 1

Show inferred positions (1)
Heideggerinferable

rejects the idea that the work reproduces a particular being: the temple represents nothing, it brings a world about. Yet this is not the invention of genius: decentres the artist in favour of the work, which "founds" a truth. Creation, for him, is an event of coming-to-pass rather than a making.

The Origin of the Work of Art (written 1935-1936, publ. 1950)