See the axis · Temporal orientation

Argument

To exist is to project oneself

Man is not a given thing: he is only what he makes of himself by projecting toward the future.

Supports

Sartre · Existentialism Is a Humanism

  1. A stone is what it is, wholly in the present. Man, by contrast, is never quite given: he relates ceaselessly to what he is not yet, what he wants to become, to do, to accomplish.
  2. This is what means: . No one is born with a ready-made nature; we are our acts and our commitments to come, and it is by projecting ourselves that we give ourselves a shape.
  3. From then on, to fall back on the instant alone, to refuse to project oneself, would be to treat oneself as a thing, to give up what makes us subjects. This retreat has a name, : hiding one's own freedom from oneself by passing for a being with no future.

Therefore So to live, for a human being, is to strain toward what is not yet: not to lose oneself in the future, but to recognize oneself there as the author of what one becomes.

How far does this reasoning convince you?

Not at all
Entirely
Deepenings
Why we are not things
  1. A thing coincides with itself; a consciousness, never. I am not my occupation the way the inkwell is an inkwell: I am it in the mode of having-to-be it, that is, by projecting myself into it.
  2. This distance from oneself is our very freedom: because nothing fixes me once and for all, I am responsible for what I make of myself, and that « what I make » is turned toward tomorrow.

How far does this reasoning convince you?

Not at all
Entirely